The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.22.002606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional light scanning laser ophthalmoscope

Abstract: The cone photoreceptor mosaic of the living human eye has in a limited number of cases been imaged without the use of wavefront-correction techniques. To accomplish this, the directionality of the photoreceptors, as manifested by their waveguiding properties, may be used to advantage. In the present paper we provide a model of our recently proposed directional light scanning laser ophthalmoscope [Opt. Lett. 29, 968 (2004)] together with a detailed numerical analysis of the device. The outcome is compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That only few cones are identifiable with annulus 2 suggests that most of the incident light is contained outside of their acceptance angle which may be estimated to be on the order of ~3° ( NA cone ≈0.06). Finally, some flickering of the cones may be appreciated in the videos that may be a consequence of interferences or reflective changes as well as changes in the coupling efficiency between the incident light and the cones for each raster scan [14]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…That only few cones are identifiable with annulus 2 suggests that most of the incident light is contained outside of their acceptance angle which may be estimated to be on the order of ~3° ( NA cone ≈0.06). Finally, some flickering of the cones may be appreciated in the videos that may be a consequence of interferences or reflective changes as well as changes in the coupling efficiency between the incident light and the cones for each raster scan [14]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected magnified regions are shown below the images from which the reduced spot size with annular apertures may be appreciated. (and associated videos) shows images recorded at the fovea centralis by means of the aforementioned 75 μm pinhole and may therefore not fully resolve the individual foveal cones. Indeed, the pinhole size matters directly since the images (like other confocal techniques) ultimately suffer from a convolution with the projected pinhole image [14]. Imaging with a smaller 50 μm pinhole (equal to 4.1 μm if projected onto the retina) has also been carried out but had lower signal and is not shown here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, SH imaging has been successfully used to image the ex vivo optic nerve head (Brown et al ., 2007) with important implications for glaucoma analysis. Eventually, the combination of multiphoton microscopy with adaptive optics (Vargas‐Martín et al ., 1998; Fernández et al ., 2001) could permit to increase the range of imaging possibilities, including the living eye and retina (Hermann et al ., 2004; Vohnsen et al ., 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%