2022
DOI: 10.1111/ner.13407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Results of an International Crossover Study With Randomized, Double-Blind Primary Endpoint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
34
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…30 The PROGRESS trial examined the changes in therapeutic window of 234 patients with PD implanted with bilateral segmented electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus. 31 Similarly to the other studies, this trial showed expansion of the therapeutic window by an average of 41% in 90.6% of patients when implementing directional stimulation compared with omnidirectional DBS; however, there were no significant improvements in stimulator battery life or motor outcomes. 31 Interestingly, the PROGRESS trial did find that both clinicians and patients preferred dDBS over omnidirectional DBS stimulation.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes Data For Directional Deep Brain Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…30 The PROGRESS trial examined the changes in therapeutic window of 234 patients with PD implanted with bilateral segmented electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus. 31 Similarly to the other studies, this trial showed expansion of the therapeutic window by an average of 41% in 90.6% of patients when implementing directional stimulation compared with omnidirectional DBS; however, there were no significant improvements in stimulator battery life or motor outcomes. 31 Interestingly, the PROGRESS trial did find that both clinicians and patients preferred dDBS over omnidirectional DBS stimulation.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes Data For Directional Deep Brain Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Indirectly, this is an indication of its usefulness in optimizing stimulation outcomes. In this context it should be noted that the Progress study did not find differences in UPDRS-III scores, whereas patient and clinician preference significantly favored directional DBS over non-directional [1]. One way to interpret those results is that small but important benefits, for instance on gait, or side effects such as dysarthria may wash out in UPDRS-III summary scores but are important to patients and may motivate the clinician to change stimulation parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Directional deep brain stimulation (d-DBS) axially displaces the volume of tissue activated towards the intended target and away from neighboring structures, potentially improving the benefit and reducing side effects of stimulation. A large prospective, randomized, multicenter, crossover study evaluating d-DBS has demonstrated a wider therapeutic window (TW) with directional stimulation than with conventional, omnidirectional stimulation in 90% of cases [1]. While a large TW intuitively seems advantageous, it is not clear how often and for what reasons directional stimulation is used in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the stimulation amplitude for symptom relief was reduced, while the threshold for the induction of side effects was incremented. The real-world differences between directional and omnidirectional STN-DBS in PD patients were recently assessed in a large, prospective, international, multicenter, double-blind randomized crossover study 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%