2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1395-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direction of saccadic and smooth eye movements induced by electrical stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effect of orbital position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that activations in the lower part of the inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis), overlapping with Broca's area (sometimes extending to the anterior insula; Dieterich et al, 2003), have not been described as vestibular cortex in animals. On the contrary, other authors found frontal activations more dorsally in the "dorsolateral prefrontal cortex" (Fasold et al, 2002), or in the middle and superior frontal gyri (Bense et al, 2001;Dieterich et al, 2003;Miyamoto et al, 2007;Stephan et al, 2005), that have been proposed to represent vestibular processing in the human FEF in relation to the control of saccades, smooth-pursuit eye movements and nystagmus (Blanke et al, 2000b;Blanke and Seeck, 2003;Paus, 1996;Petit et al, 1997). These potential homologies between oculomotor and vestibular function in human and non-human primates should be regarded with caution as there may be subtle interspecies differences in anatomico-functional organization between area 6 and 8 (Tehovnik et al, 2000).…”
Section: Vestibular Projections To the Frontal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We note that activations in the lower part of the inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis), overlapping with Broca's area (sometimes extending to the anterior insula; Dieterich et al, 2003), have not been described as vestibular cortex in animals. On the contrary, other authors found frontal activations more dorsally in the "dorsolateral prefrontal cortex" (Fasold et al, 2002), or in the middle and superior frontal gyri (Bense et al, 2001;Dieterich et al, 2003;Miyamoto et al, 2007;Stephan et al, 2005), that have been proposed to represent vestibular processing in the human FEF in relation to the control of saccades, smooth-pursuit eye movements and nystagmus (Blanke et al, 2000b;Blanke and Seeck, 2003;Paus, 1996;Petit et al, 1997). These potential homologies between oculomotor and vestibular function in human and non-human primates should be regarded with caution as there may be subtle interspecies differences in anatomico-functional organization between area 6 and 8 (Tehovnik et al, 2000).…”
Section: Vestibular Projections To the Frontal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This region is near the inferior boundary of the regions of peak activity related to visually guided saccades in fMRI experiments and has been identified as the FEF by histopathology, fMRI, and cortical stimulation experiments in humans (Ber- Milea et al, 2002;Rosano et al, 2002Rosano et al, , 2003Blanke and Seeck, 2003;Yamamoto et al, 2004). On one hand, it is a concern that the volume of the right but not the left FEF was related to the performance on the antisaccade task; on the other, our results are similar to those from similar analyses of the relationship of antisaccade correct responses to brain volume in normal adults as well as the laterality of results of some fMRI experiments (Ettinger et al, 2005;DeSouza et al, 2003).…”
Section: Localization Of Oculomotor Abnormalities In Ftld and Relatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the location and function of the human homologue of the FEF has been a matter of debate for many years (for a review see Schall 1997;Tehovnik 2000). However, electrical stimulation of a region behind, within, and before the precentral sulcus (PCS) of the human brain has been shown to provoke eye movements (Penfield and Jasper 1954;Godoy et al 1990;Lobel et al 2001;Blanke and Seeck 2003). Furthermore, there seems to be a cortical map directing movement that is implemented within the PCS (Rasmussen and Penfield 1948).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%