2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directing stem cell fate by controlled RNA interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
78
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of growth/differentiation factors to induce stem cell differentiation in vivo has some limitations such as short half-lives, denaturation during the encapsulation processes, time-consuming, long time periods to obtain the differentiated cells, use of cocktails of GFs and difficulty to differentiate the cells into one specific lineage [108,162]. Therefore, gene therapy, encoding transcription factors or encoding for a specific or to a set of proteins may be a good approach to overcome these limitations and to control stem cell differentiation [124].…”
Section: Therapeutic Gene Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of growth/differentiation factors to induce stem cell differentiation in vivo has some limitations such as short half-lives, denaturation during the encapsulation processes, time-consuming, long time periods to obtain the differentiated cells, use of cocktails of GFs and difficulty to differentiate the cells into one specific lineage [108,162]. Therefore, gene therapy, encoding transcription factors or encoding for a specific or to a set of proteins may be a good approach to overcome these limitations and to control stem cell differentiation [124].…”
Section: Therapeutic Gene Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, therapeutic proteins or GFs are produced using the cell machinery outside of the nucleus. Another way to control stem cell differentiation relies on the delivery of RNAi, as previously mentioned [162]. RNAi acts by binding to nucleic acids, inhibiting gene transcription and translation; in other words, RNAi acts by silencing genes of interest through the eradication of target mRNAs through the introduction of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) or micro-RNAs (miRNAs) [25,108,162].…”
Section: Therapeutic Gene Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sox1 is a particularly strong indicator of neural induction, as it is one of the earliest transcription factors expressed in ectodermal cells committed to a neural lineage and upregulation of Sox1 is directly correlated to neural determination and differentiation. 23,24 As shown in Figure 6C, fibroblast reprogramming using nanoparticles to deliver Sox2 led to an eight-fold increase in Sox1 expression over untreated cells and a 6-fold increase over Lipofectamine by day 12. This indicated increased levels of neural differentiation in the cells treated with Sox2 pDNA via this silica-stabilized and multistage polyplex delivery system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Consequently, miRNAs have become important tools in biological and medical research and are increasingly applied to treat and monitor disease. Overexpression or inhibition of miRNAs can simultaneously modulate the endogenous expression of multiple growth factors (Yau et al, 2012). Therefore, delivery of select miRNAs might optimise bone regeneration by coordinating endogenous angiogenesis and osteogenesis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%