2006
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506537103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directing electron transfer within Photosystem I by breaking H-bonds in the cofactor branches

Abstract: Photosystem I has two branches of cofactors down which lightdriven electron transfer (ET) could potentially proceed, each consisting of a pair of chlorophylls (Chls) and a phylloquinone (PhQ). Forward ET from PhQ to the next ET cofactor (F X) is described by two kinetic components with decay times of Ϸ20 and Ϸ200 ns, which have been proposed to represent ET from PhQ B and PhQA, respectively. Immediately preceding each quinone is a Chl (ec3), which receives a H-bond from a nearby tyrosine. To decrease the reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
101
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these ultrafast measurements, the A-branch is the faster one in primary CS and in tertiary ET. However, it is known from the nanosecond measurements (10,32) that the subsequent ET step to the F X cluster is about 10-fold slower in the A-branch (τ ∼ 200 ns vs. ∼20 ns). These facts are likely explained by the different ways in which the two branches divide up the available free energy in going from the Ant/RC* state to the P 700 þ F X state, if one assumes that the differences in rates are primarily due to differences in driving force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on these ultrafast measurements, the A-branch is the faster one in primary CS and in tertiary ET. However, it is known from the nanosecond measurements (10,32) that the subsequent ET step to the F X cluster is about 10-fold slower in the A-branch (τ ∼ 200 ns vs. ∼20 ns). These facts are likely explained by the different ways in which the two branches divide up the available free energy in going from the Ant/RC* state to the P 700 þ F X state, if one assumes that the differences in rates are primarily due to differences in driving force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain a B/A ratio of 0.61 in WT, which increases to 1.44 in PsaA-Y696F and drops to 0.35 in PsaB-Y676F (Table S2). Similar B/A branching ratios (WT-0.67, PsaA-Y696F-1.77, and PsaB-Y676F-0.21) were estimated from the amplitudes of the kinetic components representing reduction of F X by PhQ A or PhQ B (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining mutations that alter directionality of ET within PS1 with those that slow reoxidation of PhQ A (hypothesis 1 & aim 6): We combined two of the mutants that slow ET from PhQ A (PsaA-W697F and PsaA-S692A) with one that redirects ET from the A-branch to the B-branch (PsaA-Y696F; Li et al, 2006). The primary reason for doing this was to test our interpretation of the ET kinetics even further.…”
Section: Accomplishmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining mutations that alter directionality of ET within PS1 with those that slow reoxidation of PhQ A (hypothesis 1 & aim 6): We have combined two of the mutants that slow ET from PhQ A (PsaA-W697F and PsaA-S692A) with one that redirects ET from the A-branch to the B-branch (PsaA-Y696F; Li et al, 2006). The primary reason for doing this was to test our interpretation of the ET kinetics even further.…”
Section: Accomplishmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%