2018
DOI: 10.4414/smw.2018.14628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directing citizens to create advance directives

Abstract: This article describes the Swiss law on advance directives that was passed at the beginning of 2013 and led to more certainty about the legally binding character of such directives. However, for various reasons the drafting of advance directives is not yet widespread in Switzerland, and many resources might be put to better use if this became a common practice. A recent proposal by members of a political party to make the discussion, although not the actual drafting, of advance directives mandatory was rejecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a general matter, a significant segment of the population is not prepared to tackle EoL care issues, as exemplified by the low rates of execution of advance directives [69]. Indeed, Haesen and Shaw [70] reported reasons for not executing advance directives which are similar to the ones given in our study by those who declined to participate. In this sense, the high prevalence of either denial concerning future death, or inability to confront one's mortality may pose impediments to improving EoL care, and may warrant a separate investigation as to the meaning and implications of such feelings.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As a general matter, a significant segment of the population is not prepared to tackle EoL care issues, as exemplified by the low rates of execution of advance directives [69]. Indeed, Haesen and Shaw [70] reported reasons for not executing advance directives which are similar to the ones given in our study by those who declined to participate. In this sense, the high prevalence of either denial concerning future death, or inability to confront one's mortality may pose impediments to improving EoL care, and may warrant a separate investigation as to the meaning and implications of such feelings.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…After that, in all 3 countries, continuous advancements were made concerning the financing, education, and implementation strategies for palliative care. Legal regulations about end-of-life decisions and advance health care declarations were first passed in 2006 in Austria [ 36 ], followed by Germany in 2009 [ 37 ] and Switzerland in 2013 [ 38 ]. The provision granted patients a higher degree of autonomy in their health care decisions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalising the culture of engaging in organ donation conversations includes understanding the potential challenges surrounding end-of-life care and how they are associated with organ donation. The UK framework is based on the belief that organ donation "should be viewed as part of end-of-life care" (Murphy and Smith 2012), which entails integrating organ donation conversations into longer term advance care planning (ACP) conversations (Haesen and Shaw 2018;Matesanz et al 2017Matesanz et al , 1451. ACP generally provides the opportunity for people to express their treatment preferences that would apply in times of future incapacity according to their beliefs and values.…”
Section: Implications For Law and Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%