2001
DOI: 10.1038/35086653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directed deterrence by capsaicin in chillies

Abstract: The primary function of ripe, fleshy fruit is to facilitate seed dispersal by attracting consumers, yet many fruits contain unpleasant-tasting chemicals that deter consumption by vertebrates. Here we investigate this paradox in the chili (Capsicum) and find that capsaicin, the chemical responsible for the fruit's peppery heat, selectively discourages vertebrate predators without deterring more effective seed dispersers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
202
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
202
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses to oral pungency or spiciness are mediated through the trigeminal nerve. Both hot temperature and capsaicin stimulate the TRPV1 receptor in animals triggering a pain-related alarm response (Tominaga and Julius 2000). A sigmoid type response of the TRPV1 receptor to capsaicin has been reported for both mammals and chickens although the responsive concentration range to capsaicin in lab rodents is in the nM (To´th et al 2004), while in chickens is in the M and does not result in a full neuronal response such as in lab rodents (Kirifides et al 2004).…”
Section: Comparative Oral Somatosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Responses to oral pungency or spiciness are mediated through the trigeminal nerve. Both hot temperature and capsaicin stimulate the TRPV1 receptor in animals triggering a pain-related alarm response (Tominaga and Julius 2000). A sigmoid type response of the TRPV1 receptor to capsaicin has been reported for both mammals and chickens although the responsive concentration range to capsaicin in lab rodents is in the nM (To´th et al 2004), while in chickens is in the M and does not result in a full neuronal response such as in lab rodents (Kirifides et al 2004).…”
Section: Comparative Oral Somatosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences among animals have been reported regarding the sensitivity of the somatosensing system. While most mammals seem to be pain-mediated highly responsive to several spices, birds are more tolerant (Tewksbury and Nabhan 2001;Jordt and Julius 2002). For example even moderate levels of cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, capsicum oleoresin or formic acid in feed resulted in decreased feed intake in pigs (Bikker et al 2003;Eisemann and van Heugten 2007) but not in chickens (Roura, unpublished data).…”
Section: Comparative Oral Somatosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Plants synthesize a variety of chemically diverse specialized metabolites, many of which have defined roles in defense against abiotic or biotic stresses and herbivory or are involved in chemical attraction to facilitate predation, pollination, or seed dispersal (Tewksbury and Nabhan, 2001;Klee, 2010;Klahre et al, 2011;Weinhold and Baldwin, 2011;De Luca et al, 2012;Mithöfer and Boland, 2012;Dudareva et al, 2013). The bioactive properties of plant specialized metabolites have led to their exploitation by humans as flavors, fragrances, pigments, and medicines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%