2020
DOI: 10.1002/nsg.12095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct‐wave denoising of low‐frequency ground‐penetrating radar in open pits based on empirical curvelet transform

Abstract: Low‐frequency ground‐penetrating radar is known to be effective in the detection of geological disasters in open pits owing to its good detection depth, high resolution and portability. However, because of the lack of a shield layer and the poor anti‐interference capability, low‐frequency ground‐penetrating radar has certain limitations. A strong linear interference due to direct waves can result in a complex mining environment, hindering the detection of geological disasters in open pits. Conventional methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because of strong linear interference, the conventional curvelet transform is ineffective for noise removal in this case, because it cannot adaptively remove noise according to the signal characteristics; hence, a method, called the empirical curve wave transform, which can suppress interference signals, was proposed and compared with the conventional curvelet transform. The results confirmed the effectiveness of the method [9]. In addition, to remove noise from GPR echo signals, a denoising method that was based on ensemble EMD (EEMD) and the wavelet transform was presented in [10]; as compared with other common methods, the EEMD-wavelet method improves the SNR.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, because of strong linear interference, the conventional curvelet transform is ineffective for noise removal in this case, because it cannot adaptively remove noise according to the signal characteristics; hence, a method, called the empirical curve wave transform, which can suppress interference signals, was proposed and compared with the conventional curvelet transform. The results confirmed the effectiveness of the method [9]. In addition, to remove noise from GPR echo signals, a denoising method that was based on ensemble EMD (EEMD) and the wavelet transform was presented in [10]; as compared with other common methods, the EEMD-wavelet method improves the SNR.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Due to the use of a wide range of frequencies, the influence of field exploration conditions and interfere of surrounding electromagnetic waves, the recorded signal contains a lot of noise. Especially, when using lowfrequency radar, although its detection depth is large, but because of the lack of a shield layer and the poor anti-interference capability, the amount of noise is further increased (T. He & Shang, 2020). In addition, the manual data interpretation results largely depend on the experience and knowledge level of the interpreter, so the advanced applications of GPR require engagement of skilled, trained and experienced professional (Wai-Lok Lai, Dérobert, & Annan, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%