2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct vs bottom–up approach when forecasting GDP: Reconciling literature results with institutional practice

Abstract: How should we forecast GDP? Should we forecast directly the overall GDP or aggregate the forecasts for each of its components using some level of disaggregation? The search for the answer continues to motivate several horse races between these two approaches. Nevertheless, independently of the results, institutions producing shortterm forecasts usually opt for a bottom-up approach. This paper uses an application for the euro area to show that the option between direct and bottom-up approaches as the level of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these results seem to support the view that it is hard to improve significantly over a simple autoregressive model for public consumption (see also Esteves, 2013). One should mention that quarterly public consumption in Portugal presents a relatively smooth profile as it results typically from the quarterly distribution of annual figures.…”
Section: Out-of-sample Period 2002q1-2015q4 2002q1-2007q4 2008q1-2015supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, these results seem to support the view that it is hard to improve significantly over a simple autoregressive model for public consumption (see also Esteves, 2013). One should mention that quarterly public consumption in Portugal presents a relatively smooth profile as it results typically from the quarterly distribution of annual figures.…”
Section: Out-of-sample Period 2002q1-2015q4 2002q1-2007q4 2008q1-2015supporting
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, the accuracy of forecasting directly the aggregate is compared with the performance obtained via a bottom-up approach. Previous empirical work along this line includes Fair and Shiller (1990) for the United States GNP, Zellner and Tobias (2000) for GDP growth in industrialized countries, Marcellino et al (2003) for several euro area aggregates, Hubrich (2005) and Duarte and Rua (2007) for inflation in the euro area and Portugal, Esteves (2013) for euro area GDP, among others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper is closely related to Esteves (2013), Higgins (2014), Foroni and Marcellino (2014), Pareja et al (2020), Cobb (2020) and Giovannelli et al (2020). Pareja et al (2020) specify dynamic factor models for GDP and several expenditure components for the purpose of forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our main findings make a strong point in favor of forecasting an aggregate variable such as real GDP on a disaggregate component level instead of directly forecasting the aggregate variable itself. Esteves (2013) argues, that forecasters in policy institutions generally tend to opt for more disaggregate approaches owing to the fact that for communication purposes, they need a forecast "composition story" behind the GDP forecast. From a pure forecast accuracy perspective, it is not clear whether disaggregate forecasting approaches are superior to direct, aggregate approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%