2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41535-020-00252-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct visualization of irreducible ferrielectricity in crystals

Abstract: In solids, charge polarity can one-to-one correspond to spin polarity phenomenologically, e.g., ferroelectricity/ferromagnetism, antiferroelectricity/antiferromagnetism, and even dipole-vortex/magnetic-vortex, but ferrielectricity/ferrimagnetism kept telling a disparate story in microscopic level. Since the definition of a charge dipole involves more than one ion, there may be multiple choices for a dipole unit, which makes most ferrielectric orders equivalent to ferroelectric ones, i.e., this ferrielectricity… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the packing manner of NH 4 + cations in the ferrielectric LT phase of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (Figure S5). Therefore, the special packing of the two kinds of TMS cations in the extended lattice would give rise to residual spontaneous polarization macroscopically in the LT phase of (TMS) 2 CdI 4 . , Based on this structural hypothesis, the polarization was calculated to be 0.24 μC cm 2 through the point charge model (Figure S14). To further understand the occurrence of the ordered and disordered TMS cations and associated ferrielectricity, the molecular interactions between TMS + and CdI 4 2– groups were examined by plotting the Hirshfeld d norm surfaces and two-dimensional (2D) fingerprints of the two TMS cations (TMS1 and TMS2). , The red color in the Hirshfeld surfaces ( d norm mode) indicates the normalized contact distances with the two TMS cations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the packing manner of NH 4 + cations in the ferrielectric LT phase of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (Figure S5). Therefore, the special packing of the two kinds of TMS cations in the extended lattice would give rise to residual spontaneous polarization macroscopically in the LT phase of (TMS) 2 CdI 4 . , Based on this structural hypothesis, the polarization was calculated to be 0.24 μC cm 2 through the point charge model (Figure S14). To further understand the occurrence of the ordered and disordered TMS cations and associated ferrielectricity, the molecular interactions between TMS + and CdI 4 2– groups were examined by plotting the Hirshfeld d norm surfaces and two-dimensional (2D) fingerprints of the two TMS cations (TMS1 and TMS2). , The red color in the Hirshfeld surfaces ( d norm mode) indicates the normalized contact distances with the two TMS cations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first possibility is that these two peaks could be from two independent ferroelectric components with different transition points, like recently proposed “irreducible ferrielectricity” . In LiCuFe 2 (VO 4 ) 3 , there are two different magnetic ions (Cu 2+ and Fe 3+ ), and Fe 3+ ions have two nonequivalent positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At 660 K BaFe 2 Se 3 undergoes a Cmcm to P nma phase transition [26], followed by another transition at 425 K. This transition was shown, by scanning transmission electron microscopy, to be associated with an in-ladder tetramerisation, a differentiation between the two ladders of the unit cell and a room temperature polarization [16]. Putting these experimental results into perspective with our structure dynamic study, one can built a coherent picture for the BaFe 2 Se 3 phase diagram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Prominent is that BaFe 2 Se 3 is rather ferrielectric than ferroelectric, with a strong polarization in each ladder, mostly canceling out between the ladders. Its fully ferroelectric state has an energy predicted only slightly higher than the ferrielectric one and holds a giant improper polarization predicted to be ∼ 2-3µC/cm 2 , while the ferrielectric one was predicted to be ∼ 0.2µC/cm 2 [13] and experimentally estimated around ∼ 0.6µC/cm 2 [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%