2011
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201100759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct versus Hydrogen‐Assisted CO Dissociation on the Fe (100) Surface: a DFT Study

Abstract: CO dissociation: Three most probable pathways to CO dissociation on the Fe (100) surface exist: a) direct, CO→C+O (-) and H-assisted b) H+CO↔HCO→CH+O (-) or c) CO+H↔COH→C+OH (-). Under high hydrogen pressure conditions and highly occupied surfaces the formation of HCO and subsequent dissociation to CH+O may at best compete with direct dissociation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
47
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energy (E Forward ) of CO dissociation on clean Fe (100) was 1.13 eV ( Table 2) and the recombination energy (E Back ) was 2.28 eV showing the exothermic nature of the dissociation process ( Table 2). The IS, TS and FS at 0 ML coverage of H are in good agreement with the other reported calculations of Wang et al [31], Tracy et al [32], Xun-hua et al [33], and Elahifard et al [37]. The direct dissociation of CO in the presence of coadsorbed H present slight variations of forward barrier to all coverages studied, where 1.06 eV, 1.16 eV and 0.90 eV were found for 1/3-asymmetric, 1/3-symmetric and 2/3 ML of H, respectively.…”
Section: Direct Dissociation Of Co In Presence Of Hydrogensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The activation energy (E Forward ) of CO dissociation on clean Fe (100) was 1.13 eV ( Table 2) and the recombination energy (E Back ) was 2.28 eV showing the exothermic nature of the dissociation process ( Table 2). The IS, TS and FS at 0 ML coverage of H are in good agreement with the other reported calculations of Wang et al [31], Tracy et al [32], Xun-hua et al [33], and Elahifard et al [37]. The direct dissociation of CO in the presence of coadsorbed H present slight variations of forward barrier to all coverages studied, where 1.06 eV, 1.16 eV and 0.90 eV were found for 1/3-asymmetric, 1/3-symmetric and 2/3 ML of H, respectively.…”
Section: Direct Dissociation Of Co In Presence Of Hydrogensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, as similarly concluded on Fe [41,42], Co [28,30] and Ru [27] surfaces, H-assisted CO dissociation through formation of an HCO intermediate is kinetically favoured over the COH mechanism. Comparison of direct and H-assisted CO dissociation pathways based on DFT calculations has been made on pure iron surfaces [20,[41][42][43][44][45] and to a lesser extent on surfaces of Hägg iron carbide [53][54][55][56]. On Fe(100) [41] and Fe(110) [20] it was argued that both direct and H-assisted CO dissociation paths can contribute under FT reaction conditions, although on Fe(110) sequential hydrogenation of CO to form a hydroxymethylene (HCOH) species was postulated at higher CO surface coverages [20].…”
Section: H-assisted Co Dissociation On Fe-terminatedsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…On the Fe(100) surface, direct CO dissociation was calculated to have a lower overall energy barrier than H-assisted dissociation via a formyl (HCO) intermediate, while COH formation was energetically unfavourable and not competitive [41]. It was concluded that both the direct and H-assisted path via HCO formation could contribute depending on the reaction conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This energy rep-resents the energy barrier for dissociation and we can see that it follows the same pattern as the relative energy of the final minimum corresponding to the dissociated state. We know that the transition state represents the C-O bond severing by catalytic reaction with Fe [5,11,13]. From an electronic structure perspective, there are two simultaneous mechanisms that enable the C-O bond severing: 1) binding of the C atoms with strong covalent bonds to the most stable configuration (in this case hollow site) on the Fe surface and 2) compensation of the high electron affinity of the O atom by charge transfer from the surface to the O atom [15].…”
Section: Finite-size Effect On Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After almost a decade, this topic has been revisited by many researchers in recent years [10,11,[13][14][15]26]. There are several reasons for this renewed interest, of which, notable from the perspective of computational science, is the advancement in computational power that is necessary for surface calculations with the computationally demanding nudged elastic band method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%