2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct utilization of fermentation products in an alcohol fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1c and d). For all membranes other than RO the peak power continues to decrease, even with new membranes, which confirms fouling of the MEA from peptones (i.e., hydrolyzed proteins) in the fermentation broth (Mackie et al, 2013). However, when RO membranes are used, no decrease in power is observed, suggesting minimal fouling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1c and d). For all membranes other than RO the peak power continues to decrease, even with new membranes, which confirms fouling of the MEA from peptones (i.e., hydrolyzed proteins) in the fermentation broth (Mackie et al, 2013). However, when RO membranes are used, no decrease in power is observed, suggesting minimal fouling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Previously, direct utilization of products from microbial metabolism in DEFCs to generate $900 lW cm À2 in a single step was reported (Mackie et al, 2013). Although coulombic efficiencies of these biofuel cells are limited, as conversion of sugars was limited to acetic acid, the higher power densities may enable practical applications and an exciting step forward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low partial pressures, the current density increases nearly linearly with ethanol concentration, consistent with a pseudo-first-order reaction with respect to ethanol (rate constant 36 min −1 ). At higher ethanol partial pressures, the current density peaks near 3.5 mmHg at a value of 13.6 mA/cm 2 , slightly higher than the peak current density obtained when these same FCs are run on liquid ethanol–water mixtures at the same temperatures and voltage [39, 43, 48]. At higher ethanol partial pressures, there is a large run-to-run variability, along with an apparent slight decrease in current density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These FCs were chosen to be consistent with our previous studies, in which we ran them in the conventional manner, as liquid-fed direct ethanol FCs [39, 48]. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) has Pt–Ru/C as the anode catalyst, Pt/C as the cathode catalyst, and a Nafion ® 117 proton-exchange membrane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the DAFC performance may be adversely affected by many components of common fermentation media, including many salts and peptides. Additionally, room-temperature DAFCs generally do not oxidize ethanol completely to carbon dioxide, but also produce large quantities of acetic acid 13 . Even at low concentrations, acetic acid is toxic to many microorganisms including yeast, and this presents a challenge to operating the fuel cell while the fermentation continues to produce ethanol.…”
Section: H20mentioning
confidence: 99%