2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.010401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Tunneling Delay Time Measurement in an Optical Lattice

Abstract: We report on the measurement of the time required for a wave packet to tunnel through the potential barriers of an optical lattice. The experiment is carried out by loading adiabatically a Bose-Einstein condensate into a 1D optical lattice. A sudden displacement of the lattice by a few tens of nanometers excites the micromotion of the dipole mode. We then directly observe in momentum space the splitting of the wave packet at the turning points and measure the delay between the reflected and the tunneled packet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have the same time-averaged Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian (4) for all ν, the nucleation time is found to vary only rather weakly with the driving frequency. This behavior is expected to change for ν∼ν c where ν c corresponds to the center of mass oscillation frequency (see appendix C) [26]. Spanning the interval 0<ν<ν c , we could nucleate staggered states only for a frequency ν below ∼ν c /2 (see figure 3(b) with V 0 =2.6E L and ν c =8.1kHz, and appendix D), which defines experimentally the range of validity of the single band approximation.…”
Section: Experimental Findings and Comparison With Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we have the same time-averaged Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian (4) for all ν, the nucleation time is found to vary only rather weakly with the driving frequency. This behavior is expected to change for ν∼ν c where ν c corresponds to the center of mass oscillation frequency (see appendix C) [26]. Spanning the interval 0<ν<ν c , we could nucleate staggered states only for a frequency ν below ∼ν c /2 (see figure 3(b) with V 0 =2.6E L and ν c =8.1kHz, and appendix D), which defines experimentally the range of validity of the single band approximation.…”
Section: Experimental Findings and Comparison With Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our experiments were realized on our rubidium-87 BEC machine that relies on a hybrid (magnetic and optical) trap [26]. The pure BEC of 10 5 atoms in the F=1, m F =−1 state is loaded in a horizontal 1D optical lattice (lattice spacing d=532 nm) by superposing two counterpropagating lasers.…”
Section: Dynamical Instability In a Driven Bose-hubbard Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the fluctuations observed in position outside the CBS and CFS peaks are also significantly reduced because the different channels induce an additional averaging washing out the effects of the correlations of the pseudo-disorder at long times. This is particularly apparent in Figure 8, which shows the time evolution of a wave packet in the space of positions for a set of parameters which is experimentally accessible [65], namely e = 2.89, K = 6, ε = 0.8, and ω 2 = 2π 64 25 . With these parameters, the effective Heisenberg time is τ o ≈ T = 25.…”
Section: Cbs/cfs Peaks For the Atomic Kicked Rotormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One can however bypass this bottleneck by performing a phase space rotation (as explained below), converting hereby the spatial structures of the CBS and CFS peaks into well-defined, and more easily measurable signatures in the momentum distribution. Such a method has been recently experimentally demonstrated [65]. …”
Section: Proposed Experimental Protocol To Observe the Cfs And Cbs Peaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation