2008
DOI: 10.3111/13696990802063425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct treatment cost of atrial fibrillation in the elderly American population: a Medicare perspective

Abstract: Mean incremental direct treatment costs for Medicare beneficiaries with AF were higher than previously reported. Interventions that can reduce the incidence of AF and its complications may also reduce the national economic impact of AF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of another analysis from 2008, Lee et al reported that the incremental direct treatment costs for Medicare beneficiaries with AF were higher than previously reported, partly because of the significantly higher proportion of these patients experiencing strokes and congestive heart failure 10. Extrapolating these data from a random 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries to the entire Medicare population results in a projected annual cost of $15.7 billion for the treatment for newly diagnosed AF 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of another analysis from 2008, Lee et al reported that the incremental direct treatment costs for Medicare beneficiaries with AF were higher than previously reported, partly because of the significantly higher proportion of these patients experiencing strokes and congestive heart failure 10. Extrapolating these data from a random 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries to the entire Medicare population results in a projected annual cost of $15.7 billion for the treatment for newly diagnosed AF 10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hospitalizations related to AF increased >2.4‐fold from 1985 to 1999,8 and by an additional 23% in the past decade,9 contributing to the increasing costs associated with AF over the years. The annual cost of AF treatment was estimated to be $6.65 billion in 2005,7 and later estimates were even higher 10. Intervention programs at the emergency department (ED) level have been investigated and successfully implemented in some academic centers in recent years to reduce the hospitalization rates for AF and their associated costs 11, 12, 13, 14, 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Analyses of managed care databases indicate that AF patients who experienced a stroke had increased annual direct costs (range $23,143 to $37,620) relative to AF patients who did not experience a stroke ($10,380 to $15,888). 15,16,44 Of AF patients who experienced a stroke or other cerebrovascular event, those who received warfarin had lower direct costs ($26,640-$26,820) than AF patients who did not receive warfarin ($32,664-$37,620). 44 Cost-effectiveness models estimate the cost of stroke in AF patients to range from $68,039 (for perfect warfarin use) to $87,248 (for approximated routine practice where a proportion of warfarin-eligible patients are prescribed aspirin or neither warfarin nor aspirin).…”
Section: The Cost Of Stroke In Patients With Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Each patient was matched with an age-, sex-, and race-matched control. The mean incremental cost of treating AF was $16,311 (standard deviation [SD] $25,391) in the 1-year post-index period for a patient with AF compared with a patient without AF (adjusted for additional confounders, $14,199, 95% CI $13,201-15,001).…”
Section: What Is Already Known About This Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation