1933
DOI: 10.1021/ac50086a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Titration of Sulfate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1936
1936
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with certain other similar methods recently suggested for the direct titration of sulfate, the method is similar in principle to that of Schroeder (titration with barium chloride, with tetrahydroxyquinone as internal indicator, 16) and to that of Strebinger and Zombory (an indirect method using sodium rhodizonate as indicator, 17). Schroeder's method applies to quantities of 2 to 20 mg. of sulfate, while the eosin-lead nitrate titration works best for much larger quantities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with certain other similar methods recently suggested for the direct titration of sulfate, the method is similar in principle to that of Schroeder (titration with barium chloride, with tetrahydroxyquinone as internal indicator, 16) and to that of Strebinger and Zombory (an indirect method using sodium rhodizonate as indicator, 17). Schroeder's method applies to quantities of 2 to 20 mg. of sulfate, while the eosin-lead nitrate titration works best for much larger quantities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Apparently, however, no method has yet been suggested for the direct titration of sulfate with lead salts by means of an adsorption indicator. The reader is referred elsewhere for reviews of the volumetric methods for sulfate, most of which involve the use of barium chloride as standard solution (1,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, however, no method has yet been suggested for the direct titration of sulfate with lead salts by means of an adsorption indicator. The reader is referred elsewhere for reviews of the volumetric methods for sulfate, most of which involve the use of barium chloride as standard solution (1,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have already been described for the determination of sulphate. The existing manual methods, for example the standard gravimetric method 2 and the titrimetric methods 3,4 , including potentiometric methods with ion-selective electrodes, which usually involve precipitation titrations with lead(II) solution and a lead-selective electrode [4][5][6][7] , are all cumbersome, tedious and time-consuming, inconvenient for application to environmental studies in which usually large numbers of samples are involved, as well, the methodologies based on chromatography [8][9] where the usable life of an expensive chromatographic column is severally shortened. Methodologies based on flow injection analysis (FIA) have been published for sulphate determination with turbidimetric 10,11 , spectrofluorimetric 12 , atomic absorption 13 or spectrophotometric 14 detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%