2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.01.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct three-dimensional imaging of the fracture of fiber-reinforced plastic under uniaxial extension: Effect of adhesion between fibers and matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest advantage of X-ray CT over LSCM is the strong penetrative power of the X-rays that allows it to be readily used for opaque materials. It has recently been used to observe dynamical processes in fiber-reinforced plastic under uniaxial extension in which the orientation of fibers and formation of voids were clearly imaged and correlated with mechanical properties . For extremely fine resolution, the atom probe field-ion microscope was developed to allow atom probe tomography with truly atomic scale precision, though few studies have applied this type of microscopy to polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest advantage of X-ray CT over LSCM is the strong penetrative power of the X-rays that allows it to be readily used for opaque materials. It has recently been used to observe dynamical processes in fiber-reinforced plastic under uniaxial extension in which the orientation of fibers and formation of voids were clearly imaged and correlated with mechanical properties . For extremely fine resolution, the atom probe field-ion microscope was developed to allow atom probe tomography with truly atomic scale precision, though few studies have applied this type of microscopy to polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, laser-scanning confocal microscopy and X-ray computerized tomography are two imaging techniques commonly used in characterizing 3D structures of soft materials. The former was first introduced by Jinnai et al in the mid-1990s, to resolve the morphology of bicontinuous polymer mixtures, and the latter has been reported in imaging fiber-reinforced or porous polymers. , While both imaging techniques allow 3D visualization, their spatial resolutions are traditionally limited to micrometer-scale with the recent innovation of pushing it to 7 nm in resolving NP lattices and multimaterial frameworks, still far below that of electron beam-based methods (0.1–0.3 nm for TEM and 0.5–1 nm for SEM) . On the other hand, field ion microscopy was introduced in 1951, which resolved individual atoms in 1955, evolved into a 3D imaging technique called atom probe tomography (APT) in 1980s. While APT offers a high resolution below 0.15 nm on composition, it has a few drawbacks; the most prominent one is that APT is a destructive technique. Apart from consuming the specimen during analysis, APT also has limited sample size and requires special sample preparation methods such as FIB-milling and chemical fixation, which may interact with samples and introduce unwanted artifacts …”
Section: Electron Tomography Of the 3d Structure Morphology And Compo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…114−116 and the latter has been reported in imaging fiber-reinforced or porous polymers. 117,118 While both imaging techniques allow 3D visualization, their spatial resolutions are traditionally limited to micrometer-scale with the recent innovation of pushing it to 7 nm in resolving NP lattices and multimaterial frameworks, 119 still far below that of electron beam-based methods (0.1−0.3 nm for TEM and 0.5−1 nm for SEM). 120 On the other hand, field ion microscopy was introduced in 1951, which resolved individual atoms in 1955, evolved into a 3D imaging technique called atom probe tomography (APT) in 1980s.…”
Section: Electron Tomography Of the 3d Structure Morphology And Compo...mentioning
confidence: 99%