1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01262041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct sums of dual continuous modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also give some partial converses of this theorem, which extend analogous results for ^-continuous modules due to Mohamed and Muller [11,12].…”
Section: If M X M Is Qd-continuous Then M Is Quasi-projectivementioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also give some partial converses of this theorem, which extend analogous results for ^-continuous modules due to Mohamed and Muller [11,12].…”
Section: If M X M Is Qd-continuous Then M Is Quasi-projectivementioning
confidence: 61%
“…As a consequence we get the following result which extends [12 [7] Quasi-dual-continuous modules 293…”
Section: Let M Be a Qd-continuous Module And B A D-complement Of A Smentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [17] Smith and Tercan investigate the following property which they called (C 11 ): every submodule of M has a complement which is a direct summand of M. So, it was natural to introduce a dual notion of (C 11 ) which we called (D 11 ) (see [6,7]). It turns out that modules satisfying (D 11 ) are exactly the ⊕-supplemented modules. A module M is called a completely ⊕-supplemented (see [5]) (or satisfies (D + 11 ) in our terminology, see [6,7]) if every direct summand of M is ⊕-supplemented.…”
Section: Page 95] Mohamed and Müller Called A Module ⊕-Supplemented mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our next objective is to prove that over a commutative ring, if M is a finitely generated ⊕-supplemented module with corank(M) = 3, then M is a direct sum of local modules. We first prove the following generalization of [11,Lemma 2.3].…”
Section: Lemma 24 Let M Be a Nonzero Module And Let U Be A Submodulmentioning
confidence: 99%