1962
DOI: 10.1039/qr9621600001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct structural evidence for weak charge-transfer bonds in solids containing chemically saturated molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
1
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
103
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in the mirror plane; the intermolecular S ... C1 distance, 3.41 A, is 0.24 A shorter than the sum, 3.65 A, of the van der Waals radii for sulphur and chlorine. As in other compounds where a similar intermolecular configuration with short intermolecular distances is observed (Hassel & Romming, 1962), the short S. • • C1 distance may be explained by charge transfer. The sulphur atom of the longer S-C1 bond has strong interaction with a nitrogen atom of a neighbouring molecule; the S. • • N distance, 3.01 A, is 0.34 A shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii for nitrogen and sulphur.…”
Section: Determination Of the Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…in the mirror plane; the intermolecular S ... C1 distance, 3.41 A, is 0.24 A shorter than the sum, 3.65 A, of the van der Waals radii for sulphur and chlorine. As in other compounds where a similar intermolecular configuration with short intermolecular distances is observed (Hassel & Romming, 1962), the short S. • • C1 distance may be explained by charge transfer. The sulphur atom of the longer S-C1 bond has strong interaction with a nitrogen atom of a neighbouring molecule; the S. • • N distance, 3.01 A, is 0.34 A shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii for nitrogen and sulphur.…”
Section: Determination Of the Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The intermolecular O(1)...I distance is found to be 2.580 (6)A which is much shorter than the O...I van der Waals sum of 3.50A. Such O...halogen interactions have been observed in many other structures and have been analyzed in some detail (see Hassel & Romming, 1962, 1967Leser & Rabinovich, 1978;Cody & Murray-Rust, 1984;Murray-Rust & Motherwell, 1979;Ramasubbu, Parthasarathy & Murray-Rust, 1986). These O-..I interactions link the molecules to form zigzag chains (Fig.…”
Section: Table 2 Bond Lengths (A) Bond Angles (O) and Selected Torsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Halogen bonding involves a favorable noncovalent interaction between a covalently-bonded halogen and a negative site, such as a lone pair. Such interactions were already known to experimentalists in the 19th century [3,4], and were studied extensively in the 20th [5][6][7][8][9][10], with crystallography playing a major role [10][11][12][13]. Nevertheless the basis for halogen bonding was not really understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%