1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00724568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct STM mapping of the superconducting energy gap in single crystal BI2SR2CACU2O8+x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, spatially resolved spectroscopy measurements have shown clear evidence for variations in 24 associated with structural inhomogeneity. [88,891 To delineate the intrinsic versus extrinsic features of the superconducting energy gap in the high-T, materials we have reported systematic measurements on carefully annealed BSCCO-2212 samples with r, values ranging from 79 to 92 K. The STM spectroscopy measurements exhibited values of 24 that were uniform over the sample surfaces (Fig. 20) region about U = 0 and pronounced conductance onsets at +(20-25) mV.…”
Section: The Superconducting Energy Gapmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, spatially resolved spectroscopy measurements have shown clear evidence for variations in 24 associated with structural inhomogeneity. [88,891 To delineate the intrinsic versus extrinsic features of the superconducting energy gap in the high-T, materials we have reported systematic measurements on carefully annealed BSCCO-2212 samples with r, values ranging from 79 to 92 K. The STM spectroscopy measurements exhibited values of 24 that were uniform over the sample surfaces (Fig. 20) region about U = 0 and pronounced conductance onsets at +(20-25) mV.…”
Section: The Superconducting Energy Gapmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently Wolf et al [1], using scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy, directly observed superconducting Bi-O layers of Bi Sr CaCu O (BSCCO). They also reported evidence of fluctuations in superconductivity as their microscope moved across the surface, which they correlated with oxygen stoichiometry-suggesting that the superconductivity is better or worse, depending on whether the local surface contains excess oxygen.…”
Section: Evidence That Cuprate Planes Do Not Superconduct In Bsccomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can be interpreted in either of two ways: (i) the primary superconductivity is in the cuprate planes (CuO ), and induces superconductivity in the Bi-O layers by the proximity effect, which is influenced by oxygen stoichiometry [1]; or (ii) the primary superconductivity comes from the Bi-O layers themselves, and the presence or absence of oxygen at a particular spot on the surface influences that superconductivity [2].…”
Section: Evidence That Cuprate Planes Do Not Superconduct In Bsccomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolf et al [9] have measured simultaneously STM images and the dI t /dVt (s, x, y) maps on BSCCO at 4.2 K. They interpret the superconducting DOS structures observed on the uppermost BiO layer as a superconductivity induced in BiO by proximity effect from deeper CuO planes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%