Abstract:Numerous studies have shown that placement of implants in the maxillary region with resultant successful osseointegration can be achieved by the use of sinus lift procedures using piezosurgical technique. In this case report a middle aged patient had come to the outpatient department of A. J. Institute of Dental Sciences with a chief complaint of missing right posterior molar. Since the radiographic ball marker showed only 4 mm bone below the sinus in #16 region, direct sinus lift procedure was done for placem… Show more
“…Since the patient had a missing right first molar for years, there was atrophy of the edentulous area. This could have caused continuous loss of bone height and density and an increase in antral pneumatization (10,11).…”
Objetivos: O objetivo deste caso clínico foi relatar uma reabilitação unitária da região posterior da maxila, e descrever a cirurgia de levantamento de seio maxilar através da técnica de janela lateral, com colocação imediata de implante. Métodos: A cirurgia de levantamento de seio foi realizada através da técnica de janela lateral, seguida da instalação imediata do implante e posterior confecção de prótese unitária aparafusada. Resultados: Foi observada a reabilitação do elemento dental perdido através do reestabelecimento do espaço ósseo por meio da cirurgia de levantamento de seio, permitindo assim a instalação do implante imediato e confecção da prótese final. Conclusões: Seguindo um planejamento sólido e meticuloso, mesmo em cristas com menos de 5 mm de espessura, a técnica de janela lateral pode ser usada de forma previsível com um resultado clínico e radiológico adequado, dando aos pacientes excelente estabilidade do material enxertado e excelentes resultados clínicos.
“…Since the patient had a missing right first molar for years, there was atrophy of the edentulous area. This could have caused continuous loss of bone height and density and an increase in antral pneumatization (10,11).…”
Objetivos: O objetivo deste caso clínico foi relatar uma reabilitação unitária da região posterior da maxila, e descrever a cirurgia de levantamento de seio maxilar através da técnica de janela lateral, com colocação imediata de implante. Métodos: A cirurgia de levantamento de seio foi realizada através da técnica de janela lateral, seguida da instalação imediata do implante e posterior confecção de prótese unitária aparafusada. Resultados: Foi observada a reabilitação do elemento dental perdido através do reestabelecimento do espaço ósseo por meio da cirurgia de levantamento de seio, permitindo assim a instalação do implante imediato e confecção da prótese final. Conclusões: Seguindo um planejamento sólido e meticuloso, mesmo em cristas com menos de 5 mm de espessura, a técnica de janela lateral pode ser usada de forma previsível com um resultado clínico e radiológico adequado, dando aos pacientes excelente estabilidade do material enxertado e excelentes resultados clínicos.
“…Various bone augmentation procedures using bone graft materials, platelets and fibrinogen have been introduced in cases of severely resorbed ridges to create sufficient bone quantity. The use of growth factor enriched fibrin glue known as sticky bone, has shown promising results as it stabilizes bone graft preventing bone loss and accelerating tissue healing [3]. Thus, this case report elucidates the direct sinus lift procedure performed in the posterior maxilla along with the grafting procedure using sticky bone to increase the amount of available bone and preparing it for simultaneous implant placement using conventional lateral window preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is an autologous leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin matrix comprising cytokines, platelets, and stem cells that works as a biodegradable scaffold and promotes micro-vascularization and epithelial cell migration to its surface [9]. According to study performed by Antonio Cortese et al, PRF has been a safe, reliable procedure,that has drastically improved the clinical outcome of the patient with horizontal bone defects [3].…”
Aim: Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla using sticky bone and simultaneous implant placement.
Presentation of Cases: Sinus augmentation along with simultaneous implant placement prevents the additional surgery. This often benefits both the patient and the dentist. This case report highlights the sinus augmentation procedure for rehabilitation of a severely atrophic posterior maxilla using Sticky bone, a combination of Xenograft and Platelet rich fibrin with simultaneous dental implant placement.
Discussion: Pneumatization of posterior maxilla often complicates dental implant surgery. Various sinus lift surgical procedures have been developed over the years, to increase residual alveolar ridge height. Implant placement is made easier by enhancing the posterior maxilla by various sinus augmentation procedure
Conclusion: Direct sinus augmentation procedure using sticky bone for rehabilitation of severely atrophic posterior maxilla with simultaneous implant placement provides a reliable and predictable outcome.
“…This step leads to a very common complication of sinus lift procedure, the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane. Although various improving techniques like piezo surgery (Figure 1 A,B) were developed to assist the lateral access and to free the bone cover from the Schneiderian membrane, perforations are still an obvious and common problem [8].…”
Introduction: This study analyzed the influence of Schneiderian membrane perforations covered with collagen membranes on the success of augmentation and implantation as well as the influences of smoking, radiation and chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: 182 consecutive operated patients with a total of 298 augmented sinuses and 833 inserted implants were analyzed retrospectively. Success rates of sinus augmentations with perforated and unperforated Schneiderian membranes were compared. Results: Perforations of the Schneiderian membrane occurred in 23.2% (p< 0.001). Success rate decreased from 89.4% (p< 0,001) at unperforated sinuses to 80.0% (p=0.005) at perforated sinuses for the irradiated patients and from 95.6% (p< 0,001) at unperforated sinuses to 89.8% (p< 0.001) at perforated sinuses for patients not treated with radiation therapy. Similar results were found for the implant loss rate, which was highest for perforated sinuses at irradiated patients – 43.9% (p=0.023) – and lowest for unperforated sinuses at not irradiated patients – 4.5% (p< 0.001). Comparing membrane perforation to lost implants and failure rate a statistically significant difference could be detected (p=0,029). Conclusions: Although Schneiderian membrane was covered with collagen membranes in all cases, perforations still have a negative impact on success rates of augmentation and implant survival. Possible improvements of this method should be investigated in following studies. Keywords: Radiation therapy; Smoking; Chemotherapy; Sinus augmentation; Implant loss; Implant survival;
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.