Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1116/1.3386592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct simulation Monte Carlo modeling of e-beam metal deposition

Abstract: Three-dimensional direct simulation Monte Carlo ͑DSMC͒ method is applied here to model the electron-beam physical vapor deposition of copper thin films. Various molecular models for copper-copper interactions have been considered and a suitable molecular model has been determined based on comparisons of dimensional mass fluxes obtained from simulations and previous experiments. The variable hard sphere model that is determined for atomic copper vapor can be used in DSMC simulations for design and analysis of v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the dimensional mass flux profiles for the various DSMC simulations are significantly different and only the DSMC simulation performed using molecular model 3 agrees well with the experiments. A similar trend was shown for other experimental conditions corresponding to various Kn numbers with model 3 leading to very good agreement between DSMC simulations [5] and the experiments. …”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the dimensional mass flux profiles for the various DSMC simulations are significantly different and only the DSMC simulation performed using molecular model 3 agrees well with the experiments. A similar trend was shown for other experimental conditions corresponding to various Kn numbers with model 3 leading to very good agreement between DSMC simulations [5] and the experiments. …”
Section: Comparison With Experimentssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For copper-copper interaction, parameters of Lennard-Jones(LJ) potential based on experimental data on cohesive energy at room temperatures are reported [3] as σ = 2.277 × 10 −10 m and ε = 0.415 eV . The LJ potential parameters obtained using the empirical correlations of Bird et.al [4] are given by [5] σ = 2.242 × 10 −10 m and ε = 0.281 eV . The two LJ potential parameter sets are used to calculate the variation of viscosity as a function of temperature given by [6,7] …”
Section: Molecular Models For Metal Vaporsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While ω for the common gases was taken from Bird, 1 the ω for copper was taken from Venkattraman and Alexeenko. 26 The ω for Al and Au were taken as 1.0 due to lack of data. Typically, the attractive component of the force is important for temperatures corresponding to * ≤ 2.…”
Section: Theory and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%