2007
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography

Abstract: This paper presents a novel algorithm to reconstruct parameters of a sufficient number of current dipoles that describe data (equivalent current dipoles, ECDs, hereafter) from radial/vector magnetoencephalography (MEG) with and without electroencephalography (EEG). We assume a three-compartment head model and arbitrary surfaces on which the MEG sensors and EEG electrodes are placed. Via the multipole expansion of the magnetic field, we obtain algebraic equations relating the dipole parameters to the vector MEG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the case of a collection of dipoles, is analysed in Dassios & Fokas (preprint a,b) for spherical and ellipsoidal geometries, respectively. For other related important works, see El Badia & Ha-Duong (2000), Jerbi et al (2002), Nara & Ando (2003), Nolte & Dassios (2005), Albanese & Monk (2006), Peng et al (2006), Nara et al (2007) and Leblond et al (preprint). This paper is organized as follows: the equations needed for EEG and MEG in a three-shell model are derived in §2; this is done for the sake of completeness so that this paper is self-contained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the case of a collection of dipoles, is analysed in Dassios & Fokas (preprint a,b) for spherical and ellipsoidal geometries, respectively. For other related important works, see El Badia & Ha-Duong (2000), Jerbi et al (2002), Nara & Ando (2003), Nolte & Dassios (2005), Albanese & Monk (2006), Peng et al (2006), Nara et al (2007) and Leblond et al (preprint). This paper is organized as follows: the equations needed for EEG and MEG in a three-shell model are derived in §2; this is done for the sake of completeness so that this paper is self-contained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) from c m (m = 0, 1, ···) appears in many inverse problems such as computed tomography (Golub et al (1997)), EEG inversion (El-Badia et al (2000); Nara et al (2003)), MEG inversion (Nara et al (2007)), and locating the zeros of analytic functions (Kravanja et al (1994) …”
Section: Explicit Methods For the Equivalent Current Dipolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ω 3 represents the head. We assume that the radial component of the magnetic field is measured on the sphere Γ = ∂Ω 4 with the radius of R. Although we use this simple head modelaswellasthesphericalsensorsurface,themethodcanbeextendedtoamorerealistic case when the head is modeled by a piecewise homogeneous layered domain and the sensors are set on an arbitrarily shaped surface (Nara et al (2007)). Let us assume that the neural current J p is supported on several domains D k (⊂ Ω 1 ) for k = 1, 2, ··· , N. The 'center' position of D k is denoted by r k =( x k , y k , z k ) T ;t h isist h ema in parameter to be reconstructed.…”
Section: Problem Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the usual algorithm for this source model is the non-linear least-squares method that minimizes the squared error of the data and the forward solution, it has a problem that an initial parameter estimate close to the true one is required without which the algorithm often converges to a local minimum. To address this issue, several researchers have proposed a direct method [1][2][3][4] which reconstructs the source parameters directly and algebraically from the data. From the efficiency of the algorithm, it is expected to be used for real-time monitoring of the brain activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%