2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2022.102626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct quantification of cytosolic delivery of drug nanocarriers using FlAsH-EDT2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, measuring cell penetration of biomolecules is not straightforward. In recent years, chemical biologists have developed a variety of strategies for quantifying passive penetration, total cellular uptake, and cytosolic/nuclear penetration with different detection methods including fluorescence microscopy, [4][5][6][7] mass-spectrometry, [8][9][10][11][12][13] NMR, 14 flow cytometry, [15][16][17] FACS, 18,19 qPCR, 20 luminescence, 21,22 or ELISA. 23 For cell-based assays, the choice of cell line is critical and measurement with different methods and/or in different cell lines can lead to different results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measuring cell penetration of biomolecules is not straightforward. In recent years, chemical biologists have developed a variety of strategies for quantifying passive penetration, total cellular uptake, and cytosolic/nuclear penetration with different detection methods including fluorescence microscopy, [4][5][6][7] mass-spectrometry, [8][9][10][11][12][13] NMR, 14 flow cytometry, [15][16][17] FACS, 18,19 qPCR, 20 luminescence, 21,22 or ELISA. 23 For cell-based assays, the choice of cell line is critical and measurement with different methods and/or in different cell lines can lead to different results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measuring cell penetration of biomolecules is not straightforward. In recent years, chemical biologists have developed a variety of strategies for quantifying passive penetration, total cellular uptake, and cytosolic/nuclear penetration with different detection methods including, but not limited to, fluorescence microscopy, mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, fluorescence spectroscopy, NMR, flow cytometry, FACS, , qPCR, luminescence, , and ELISA . For cell-based assays, the choice of cell line is critical, and measurements with different methods and/or in different cell lines often produce different results. In addition, model cell lines such as HeLa are often convenient, but they do not always recapitulate normal cellular physiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%