1981
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/196.1.87p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct photography of the nebular remnant of nova Delphini 1967

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As to HR Del the nebulosity in [OIII] 5007Å was already reported (see e.g. Kohoutek 1981). For the year 1995 the nebulosity was expected to be larger than that we observed, so that we think that our small values are either due to the low brightness of the nebula relative to the very bright star in the centre, or that we see only the brightest part of the nebula.…”
Section: Possible Nebulaesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…As to HR Del the nebulosity in [OIII] 5007Å was already reported (see e.g. Kohoutek 1981). For the year 1995 the nebulosity was expected to be larger than that we observed, so that we think that our small values are either due to the low brightness of the nebula relative to the very bright star in the centre, or that we see only the brightest part of the nebula.…”
Section: Possible Nebulaesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…More recently, Harman & O'Brien (2003) obtained a new value of the distance, d = 0.97 ± 0.07 kpc, also from the expansion parallax method using HST imaging. Other, older, estimates are all between the above two estimates, i.e., d = 0.940 ± 0.155 kpc from various expansion par- allax methods (Malakpur 1975;Kohoutek 1981;Duerbeck 1981;Solf 1983;Cohen & Rosenthal 1983;Slavin et al 1994Slavin et al , 1995 or d = 0.835 ± 0.092 kpc from other techniques (Drechsel et al 1977). If we adopted the new distance estimate of d = 0.97 kpc (Harman & O'Brien 2003) and the extinction of E(B −V ) = 0.15 (Verbunt 1987), the distance modulus is (m − M) V = 5 log 970/10 + 3.1 × 0.15 = 10.4, which is perfectly consistent with the value in Equation (11).…”
Section: Hr Del 1967mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Spatially unresolved optical spectra display six-peaked profiles which were interpreted as evidence for the ejection of an oblate shell with two equatorial bands and polar blobs (Hutchings 1972). The first resolved photographs of the shell (Kohoutek 1981) taken in the light of [O III] revealed an oval brightness distribution of size 3.7 × 2.5 arcsec 2 . Solf (1983) obtained high-resolution spatially resolved spectra and proposed that the shell was in fact prolate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%