Direct participation of people with communication disabilities in research on poverty and disabilities in low and middle income countries: A critical review

Abstract

Introduction An estimated 1 billion people with disabilities live in low and middle income countries, a population that includes people with communication disabilities (PwCD). PwCD are a heterogenous group with a wide range of abilities who may be underrepresented in research due to the communication demands involved in research participation. Methods A critical analysis of 145 studies from a previously published systematic review was undertaken with the aim of documenting the opportunities for direct participation of PwCD in research on poverty and disability in low- and middle- income countries. Results The key finding was the high risk of underrepresentation of PwCD in research on poverty and disability in LMICs, despite low rates of explicit exclusion (n = 8; 5.5%). A total of 366 uses of data collection tools were analysed (255 unique tools). The majority of data collection tools had high communication demands (92.9%), including those measuring disability (88.6%) and those assessing poverty (100%). Only 22 studies (15.2%) specifically included PwCD. A subset of these studies (n = 14) presented disaggregated data in a way that allowed for analysis of outcomes for PwCD, suggesting a clear intersection between poverty and communication disability, with findings related to general poverty indicators, reduced access to education, low levels of employment, and additional expenditure. Conclusions The findings suggest a systematic underrepresentation of PwCD in research on poverty and disability with substantial implications for future policy and program planning, directly affecting the availability and provision of services and resources for this population. A failure to provide adequate opportunity for participation of PwCD in research risks leaving those with communication disabilities behind in the pursuit of global poverty eradication.

The ontology and epistemology shaping our understanding of inclusion: A critical review of the research literature on disability and inclusion

“…Blasko et al (2022) identified in their meta‐analysis that research in disability disproportionately concerns high‐income countries, even though most people living with disability globally live in middle‐ and low‐income countries. Jagoe et al (2021) highlight that there are specific barriers to engaging people with disabilities in research in low‐income countries, which prevents the success of global efforts to reduce poverty. While these systematic reviews help to identify gaps in existing knowledge, both only included studies in English, demonstrating the urgent need for multi‐lingual research.…”

The state of global research on poverty after SDG declaration

“…However, the research productivity on poverty from disciplines, such as 'Dentistry', 'Decision Sciences', 'Nursing' and engineering disciplines was very low. This shows the need to scale up research productivity in these disciplines because research contributions enhance the holistic understanding of the poverty problem, which thus helps in informing evidence-based strategies needed for eliminating it [46][47][48].…”

Disability types, determinants and healthcare utilisation amongst Afghan adults: a secondary analysis of the Model Disability Survey of Afghanistan

“…There is a dearth of research investigating the needs of persons with different disability types 32 33. Future research should further explore the experiences that people with different disabilities have in various facets of their life; this will help guide effective strategising and programming by the government, NGOs and healthcare system.…”