2020
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Oral Feeding Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (NUTRIENT II trial)

Abstract: Objective: Patients undergoing an esophagectomy are often kept nil-by-mouth postoperatively out of fear for increasing anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications. This study investigates the effect of direct start of oral feeding following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with standard of care. Background: Elements of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been successfully introduced in patients undergoing an esophage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
53
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The study is limited by the retrospective analysis and a potential selection bias. Since the evidence for early oral food intake after esophagectomy and gastrectomy came up more recently [2,40] the restrictions within the first days were very "traditional". Nevertheless, all calorie intake will be inappropriate for a longer period of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study is limited by the retrospective analysis and a potential selection bias. Since the evidence for early oral food intake after esophagectomy and gastrectomy came up more recently [2,40] the restrictions within the first days were very "traditional". Nevertheless, all calorie intake will be inappropriate for a longer period of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programs (ERAS), perioperative nutrition therapy seems to be very "traditional" and even redundant [1]. Early oral feeding is feasible even after esophagectomy and without impact on the incidence and severity of postoperative complications [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERAS protocols resulted in faster recovery from surgery and reduced morbidity rates in observational studies [17]. RCTs have been done only rarely on aspects of ERAS protocols after esophagectomy [18]. Overall, ERAS protocols can be judged as safe, feasible, and promising, but without an evidence-based effect on patient outcomes [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we used data of patients participating in the NUTritional Route In Esophageal Resection Trial (NUTRIENT) II study. 14 The NUTRIENT II study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee United (MEC-U) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT02378948 and at the Dutch trial registry with registration number NTR4972. The NUTRIENT II study was a multicenter prospective open-label randomized controlled trial performed at two hospital units in the Netherlands and one hospital in Sweden between October 1, 2015, and May 14, 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently it was demonstrated that direct oral feeding was well tolerated and resulted in a similar functional recovery and complication rate compared to standard of care. 14 Patients in the intervention group directly started a oral diet whereas patients in standard of care received nil-by-mouth for the first 5 days after surgery and tube feeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%