1979
DOI: 10.1021/ic50194a029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct observation of singlet-triplet separation in dimeric copper(II) acetate by neutron inelastic scattering spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bleaney and Bowers first recognized the triplet state epr spectrum of copper(I1) acetate monohydrate (4) and solved the S = 1 spin Hamiltonian parameters. 'There is strong antiferromagnetic coupling in such dimers and a -25 value of 298 + 4 cm-' was determined recently by direct spectroscopic measurements by neutron scattering (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Bleaney and Bowers first recognized the triplet state epr spectrum of copper(I1) acetate monohydrate (4) and solved the S = 1 spin Hamiltonian parameters. 'There is strong antiferromagnetic coupling in such dimers and a -25 value of 298 + 4 cm-' was determined recently by direct spectroscopic measurements by neutron scattering (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[3,92,93] It is extremely important to use a good crystal structure determination in order to reproduce the coupling constant properly, since deviations in the geometrical parameters can induce large changes in the calculated coupling constant. For instance, we have calculated the coupling constant of copper acetate using the geometry taken from an earlier structural determination.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the magnetic interaction in this system was a matter of controversy during three decades: Do the two d x 2 -y 2 unpaired electrons interact directly via a ␦-bond or indirectly through the acetato-ligands? 37 The experimental works of Güdel et al 38 ͑around Ϫ1000 cm Ϫ1 ͒, well established from Raman 40 and neutron diffraction 41 experiments. Different theoretical approaches have been employed to evaluate J ͓for instance, finite 8 and periodic 42 DFT calculations, nonorthogonal CI ͑Ref.…”
Section: Description Of the Models And Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 98%