2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-012-1528-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Observation of k∥ and k⊥ Stripe Excitations in La2−x Sr x CuO4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17. The B 1g and B 2g gap energies are consistent with the reported results 82,86,90,94,96 . The B 2g gap energies are located between the B 1 and B 3 peak energies at x ≤ 0.15.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…17. The B 1g and B 2g gap energies are consistent with the reported results 82,86,90,94,96 . The B 2g gap energies are located between the B 1 and B 3 peak energies at x ≤ 0.15.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Magnetic scattering arises from two mechanisms, two-magnon scattering and highenergy electronic scattering. The two mechanisms have different symmetries [14]. Using the difference we disclosed the following results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the previous conference (Superstripes 2011) we presented the direct observation of individual k|| and k ⊥ stripe magnetic excitations in a fluctuating spincharge stripe state utilizing high-energy Raman scattering [14]. The advantage of Raman scattering is the unique selection rule which is determined by two Cartesian vectors parallel to the electric fields of incident and scattered light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is preferable to find the relation between χ (ω) and σ (ω), because the low-energy Raman spectra are derived from the coherent parts which have no correlation. The B 1g and B 2g Raman spectra have a large hump from 1000 to 3500 cm −1 [30,31]. The intensity is enhanced as temperature decreases from 300 to 5 K. From the carrier density dependence of the low-energy edge, we assigned the hump to the separated dispersion segments of the spin wave in the k direction perpendicular to the spin-charge stripe [30,31] based on the calculation by Seibold and Lorenzana [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%