2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.026601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Observation of Domain-Wall Configurations Transformed by Spin Currents

Abstract: Direct observations of current-induced domain-wall propagation by spin-polarized scanning electron microscopy are reported. Current pulses move head-to-head as well as tail-to-tail walls in submicrometer Fe20Ni80 wires in the direction of the electron flow, and a decay of the wall velocity with the number of injected current pulses is observed. High-resolution images of the domain walls reveal that the wall spin structure is transformed from a vortex to a transverse configuration with subsequent pulse injectio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

19
327
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(52 reference statements)
19
327
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the observed maximum velocities are underestimated by a factor of about 1.5, and the velocity plateaus are unexpected within this model. As evidenced repeatedly in both simulations 3 and experiments 30 , an abrupt change in velocity often results from a modification of the nature of the DW. A modification of the domain profile can indeed be seen on the domain images of samples A3 and A4 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the observed maximum velocities are underestimated by a factor of about 1.5, and the velocity plateaus are unexpected within this model. As evidenced repeatedly in both simulations 3 and experiments 30 , an abrupt change in velocity often results from a modification of the nature of the DW. A modification of the domain profile can indeed be seen on the domain images of samples A3 and A4 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The underlying mechanism of CIDWM was first investigated. The microscopic structure of a DW was observed by using advanced imaging techniques, [21][22][23] from which it was found that there are four types of DWs: transverse and vortex DWs with clockwise and counterclockwise spin rotation. It was revealed that among the DW types, the vortex DW is more mobile than the transverse one.…”
Section: Progress In Study Of Current-induced Domain Wall Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was revealed that among the DW types, the vortex DW is more mobile than the transverse one. 22) Issues related to non-adiabatic STT were also actively discussed. At the time, most of the CIDWM results were assumed to be predominantly governed by the non-adiabatic STT because the current densities required to move the DW were much smaller than the threshold value predicted theoretically on the basis of intrinsic pinning.…”
Section: Progress In Study Of Current-induced Domain Wall Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.012402 PACS number͑s͒: 75.60.Ch, 75.70.Kw, 75.75.ϩa Numerous recent studies in the fields of nanomagnetism and magnetization ͑M͒ dynamics have focused on magnetic field and/or current driven dynamic motions of domain walls ͑DWs͒ in patterned magnetic thin film nanostrips, 1-7 owing to the potential applications to solid-state data storage and logic devices. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] One of the most fundamental issues in this field is the underlying physics of the breakdown of DW velocity and oscillatory DW motions under magnetic fields exceeding a threshold field known as the Walker field, H w . This question has been approached by Walker, 15 Thiaville et al, 16 and Nakatani et al 3 within the context of one-dimensional ͑1D͒ models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] One of the most fundamental issues in this field is the underlying physics of the breakdown of DW velocity and oscillatory DW motions under magnetic fields exceeding a threshold field known as the Walker field, H w . This question has been approached by Walker, 15 Thiaville et al, 16 and Nakatani et al 3 within the context of one-dimensional ͑1D͒ models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%