2015
DOI: 10.1021/jp511899q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Observation of Coupling between Structural Fluctuation and Ultrafast Hydration Dynamics of Fluorescent Probes in Anionic Micelles

Abstract: The coupling of structural fluctuation and the dynamics of associated water molecules of biological macromolecules is vital for various biological activities. Although a number of molecular dynamics (MD) studies on proteins/DNA predicted the importance of such coupling, experimental evidence of variation of hydration dynamics with controlled structural fluctuation even in model macromolecule is sparse and raised controversies in the contemporary literature. Here, we have investigated dynamics of hydration at t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas C500 is localized in the polar side (head group region) of the micellar surface, DCM prefers to reside in the more hydrophobic region of the surface of the micelles. 18 The timescale of water relaxation dynamics in the micelle-water interface has been found to be in 10-100 ps range, [19][20][21][22] which was nicely consistent with the relaxation time ($50 ps) reported by ACYMAN. 14 Furthermore, compared to ACYMAN, both C500 and DCM fail to probe the interfacial solvation dynamics of a model protein-surfactant interface.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Whereas C500 is localized in the polar side (head group region) of the micellar surface, DCM prefers to reside in the more hydrophobic region of the surface of the micelles. 18 The timescale of water relaxation dynamics in the micelle-water interface has been found to be in 10-100 ps range, [19][20][21][22] which was nicely consistent with the relaxation time ($50 ps) reported by ACYMAN. 14 Furthermore, compared to ACYMAN, both C500 and DCM fail to probe the interfacial solvation dynamics of a model protein-surfactant interface.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The relative abundance of BW decreases for AOT, whereas that for BHDC increases with increasing mole fraction of Brij‐30. The relative abundance of the bound water molecules and its variation in the presence of a nonionic surfactant probably affects the dynamics of water molecules within the reverse micelle core owing to the coupled nature of the water and surfactant molecules …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to BHDC, a high abundance of BW is observedi nt he case of the AOT reverse micelles.T he relative abundance of BW decreases for AOT,w hereas that for BHDC increases with increasing mole fraction of Brij-30.T he relative abundance of the boundw ater molecules and its variation in the presence of an onionic surfactantp robably affects the dynamics of water molecules within the reverse micelle core owing to the coupled nature of the water and surfactant molecules. [37] The time-resolved fluorescence of the AC1 dye was monitored to probe the dynamics of water molecules entrapped within the core of the reverse micelles. Figure 4a and be xhibit the steady-state emission spectra of AC1 in the reverse micelles of BHDC and AOT,r espectively.T he fluorescencep eak maximum of AC1 in pure water ( % 515 nm, data not shown) is significantly blueshifted to 424 and 427 nm, respectively,i nt he reversem icelles (W 0 = 8) of BHDC/benzenea nd AOT/benzene, respectively.T he observedb lueshift in the cationic (BHDC/benzene) reversem icellesr elative to the anionic (AOT/benzene) probablyo riginates from the reduced polarity of its interface compared with the latter.H owever,u pon the addition of Brij-30 to both BHDC and AOT reverse micelles, an insignificant shift in the emission peak maximum is observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRET distance distribution calculation : Distance distribution function P(r) was evaluated using the procedure described in the previous literature . The decay transient of donor in absence of acceptor were fitted using nonlinear least‐squares fitting procedure (software SCIENTIST from Micromath (Saint Louis, MO, USA) to the following function InormalD(t)=0tE(t)P(t'-t)dt' …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%