2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.113001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Observation of a Sub-Poissonian Number Distribution of Atoms in an Optical Lattice

Abstract: We report single-site resolution in a lattice with tunneling between sites, allowing for an in situ study of stochastic losses. The ratio of the loss rate to the tunneling rate is seen to determine the number fluctuations, and the overall profile of the lattice. Sub-Poissonian number fluctuations are observed. Deriving the lattice beams from a microlens array results in perfect relative stability between beams.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, sub-Poissonian number fluctuations of ultracold atoms have been observed only for small clouds of bosons with typically a few hundred atoms [13][14][15][16] and directly [17,18] or indirectly [19] for the bosonic Mott in- Ballistic expansion conserves phase space density and shears the initially occupied spherical area into an ellipse. In the center of the cloud, the local Fermi momentum and the sharpness of the Fermi distribution are scaled by the same factor, keeping the ratio of local temperature to Fermi energy constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until now, sub-Poissonian number fluctuations of ultracold atoms have been observed only for small clouds of bosons with typically a few hundred atoms [13][14][15][16] and directly [17,18] or indirectly [19] for the bosonic Mott in- Ballistic expansion conserves phase space density and shears the initially occupied spherical area into an ellipse. In the center of the cloud, the local Fermi momentum and the sharpness of the Fermi distribution are scaled by the same factor, keeping the ratio of local temperature to Fermi energy constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the band insulator, Mott insulator, and also the antiferromagnet for which spin fluctuations, i.e. fluctuations of the difference in density between the two spin states, are suppressed.Until now, sub-Poissonian number fluctuations of ultracold atoms have been observed only for small clouds of bosons with typically a few hundred atoms [13][14][15][16] and directly [17,18] or indirectly [19] for the bosonic Mott in- …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An array of optical microtraps with each site storing a single atom [7][8][9][10] is a promising working arrangement to fulfill the DiVicenzo criteria. The probability of having an array of N sites all filled with an atom simultaneously scales with the single atom preparation efficiency to the power of N. Therefore high efficiency loading of single neutral atoms is an important step to realize a scalable quantum information processing device [7,[11][12][13]. Additionally, trapped single cold atoms in separate traps has minimal perturbation due to interaction with the environment, which is utilized in quantum metrology in such apparatus as a 3D optical lattice clock [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few different approaches have been developed to achieve efficient preparation of single neutral atoms in FORTs. These include the redistribution of individual atoms into arrays of microtraps by atom-sorting [24], isolation of single atoms in microtraps by using the superfluid to Mott-insulator transition from a Bose-Einstein condensate [11,25,26] or using Pauli's exclusion principle [23], and using the Rydberg blockade mechanism [27], Penning ionization [28], or repulsive light-assisted collisions [29][30][31] to ensure that the trap is not occupied by more than one atom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, time-of-flight measurements directly image the Fermi surface of the atoms in the optical lattice, as initial momentum maps into final position [19,20]. As opposed to measuring the momentum distribution of the lattice atoms, direct in situ imaging makes it possible to reconstruct the atom number distribution in the optical lattice with single-atom and single-site resolution, as realized in, e.g., [21,[23][24][25][26][27]. Although there is no doubt that the aforementioned methods offer extremely valuable insights, they suffer from an obvious drawback: the quantum state of the atoms in the optical lattice is destroyed or collapsed (loss of phase coherence) by the measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%