2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of stratified Ekman layers over a periodic rough surface

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the intermittency profiles observed in figure 4( a ) show a remarkable resemblance to that of the intermittency observed in studies of neutrally stratified Ekman flow (Ansorge & Mellado 2014, 2016; Lee, Gohari & Sarkar 2020). In atmospheric literature such intermittency is classified as ‘external’: that is, the flow is separated into in an inner turbulent flow near the wall and an outer or external non-turbulent flow above.…”
Section: Turbulent/non-turbulent Identification Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We note that the intermittency profiles observed in figure 4( a ) show a remarkable resemblance to that of the intermittency observed in studies of neutrally stratified Ekman flow (Ansorge & Mellado 2014, 2016; Lee, Gohari & Sarkar 2020). In atmospheric literature such intermittency is classified as ‘external’: that is, the flow is separated into in an inner turbulent flow near the wall and an outer or external non-turbulent flow above.…”
Section: Turbulent/non-turbulent Identification Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The spatio‐temporal evolution of the flow is computed with the nondimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes system of equations for Newtonian fluids, in conjunction with a scalar transport equation for the buoyancy field simplified with the Boussinesq approximation. Following previous works (Coleman et al, 1992; Ansorge and Mellado, 2014; Lee et al, 2020), the equations for the stratified Ekman boundary layer (EBL) problem can be written as alignleftalign-1uixialign-2=0,$$ \frac{\partial {u}_i}{\partial {x}_i}\kern0.5em =0,\kern1.00em $$ trueuit+true12()ujtrueuixj+trueuiujxj=true1Retrue2uixjxjprefix−truepxi+fi+einormalgbRi,$$ \kern-.5em \frac{\partial {u}_i}{\partial t}+\frac{1}{2}\left({u}_j\frac{\partial {u}_i}{\partial {x}_j}+\frac{\partial {u}_i{u}_j}{\partial {x}_j}\right)=\frac{1}{\mathit{\operatorname{Re}}}\frac{\partial^2{u}_i}{\partial {x}_j\partial {x}_j}-\frac{\partial p}{\partial {x}_i}+{f}_i+{e}_i^{\mathrm{g}} bR\mathrm{i}, $$ alignleftalign-1bt+ujbxj...…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The spatio-temporal evolution of the flow is computed with the nondimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes system of equations for Newtonian fluids, in conjunction with a scalar transport equation for the buoyancy field simplified with the Boussinesq approximation. Following previous works (Coleman et al, 1992;Ansorge and Mellado, 2014;Lee et al, 2020), the equations for the stratified Ekman boundary layer (EBL) problem can be written as…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that with this definition, the laminar and dispersive fluxes are also explicitly included in the framework, while the original MOST is based on homogeneous flow at infinite Reynolds number and therefore only includes the turbulent fluxes (Shah & Bou-Zeid 2014). Nevertheless, recent DNS studies involving heterogeneous surfaces have also incorporated laminar and (implicit) dispersive fluxes in their comparisons to MOST (Lee, Gohari & Sarkar 2020; Mironov & Sullivan 2023). Figure 7( a ) shows profiles of the local Obukhov length scale for the present simulations with .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%