2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of gas–solid suspensions at moderate Reynolds number: Quantifying the coupling between hydrodynamic forces and particle velocity fluctuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other relevant timescale ratio is the time that the particle configuration takes to change compared to d p /| U |, and this time scale ratio depends on Re T = d p T 1/2 /ν, which is the Reynolds number based on the particle fluctuating velocity that is characterized by the particle granular temperature T. In our simulations we have Re T = 0. While one expects finite granular temperature in risers, both direct numerical simulations of freely-evolving suspensions [58] and recent high-speed imaging of particles [12] show that this value of Re T is low. Hence, these numerical simulations of turbulence past fixed clusters of spheres can be considered a reasonable approximation to gas-solid riser flows where particles have high Stokes number (moderate Re p , high particle/fluid density ratio) and relatively low levels of particle velocity fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The other relevant timescale ratio is the time that the particle configuration takes to change compared to d p /| U |, and this time scale ratio depends on Re T = d p T 1/2 /ν, which is the Reynolds number based on the particle fluctuating velocity that is characterized by the particle granular temperature T. In our simulations we have Re T = 0. While one expects finite granular temperature in risers, both direct numerical simulations of freely-evolving suspensions [58] and recent high-speed imaging of particles [12] show that this value of Re T is low. Hence, these numerical simulations of turbulence past fixed clusters of spheres can be considered a reasonable approximation to gas-solid riser flows where particles have high Stokes number (moderate Re p , high particle/fluid density ratio) and relatively low levels of particle velocity fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The turbulent multiphase flows, complicated by the presence of hard-to-quantify interactions between phases, are also a widely pursued research subject [29][30][31]. Due to the stochastic nature of turbulence in multiphase flows emanating from both the carrier-phase turbulence and from the interaction of dispersed phase particles with the carrier phase (also sometimes referred to as pseudo-turbulence) [32][33][34][35], the problem of turbulent multiphase flow is far more complex than its single-phase counterpart. Quantification of pseudoturbulence (carrier phase velocity fluctuations due to dispersed phase) has been mostly limited to sub-Kolmogorov [31,[36][37][38] scales and only recent studies have extended such analysis to large particles [32,35] using Particle-Resolved Direct Numerical Simulations (PR-DNS)…”
Section: Challenges and Technical Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our understanding of key mechanisms responsible for turbulence attenuation, production, and cascading over scales in multiphase flows over a range of physical conditions is still lacking. PR-DNS of gas-solid suspensions resolving the flow around particles up to the smallest scales [32,41,61,69] presents itself as an excellent tool to study in-depth the above mechanisms and develop models that can be inputted into CFD simulations of PJM like applications. It should be noted that any activity relying on detailed numerical experiments (even PR-DNS) should be accompanied by detailed experiments for validation purposes.…”
Section: Proposed Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent findings by Tenneti et al (2010b), however, indicate that such treatments are not appropriate. Figure 2 shows a plot of the streamwise component of fluctuations in particle acceleration A ′′ versus the streamwise component of fluctuations in particle velocity V. The fluctuations in the particle acceleration and velocity are defined with respect to their corresponding mean values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, for the system of Figure 1c, the presence of numerous particles moving in different directions will lead to continually-changing fluid-dynamic interactions between particles (i.e., fluctuations in the fluid velocity and pressure fields) even at low Reynolds number. Finally, and perhaps more importantly, a common assumption in works that incorporate gas-and/or solid-phase fluctuations is that the basic form of the mean fluid force [F fluid = β(U g − U)] also holds for its instantaneous counterpart by simply replacing the mean hydrodynamic fields with instantaneous ones [e.g.,Recent findings by Tenneti et al (2010b), however, indicate that such treatments are not appropriate. Figure 2 shows a plot of the streamwise component of fluctuations in particle acceleration A ′′ versus the streamwise component of fluctuations in particle velocity V. The fluctuations in the particle acceleration and velocity are defined with respect to their corresponding mean values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%