2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3481147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of breakdown to turbulence in a Mach 6 boundary layer over a porous surface

Abstract: Transition to turbulence of a Mach 6 flat plate boundary layer over a porous surface is investigated by direct numerical simulation considering two Reynolds numbers based on the laminar boundary layer displacement thickness, namely, Reδ∗=6000 and Reδ∗=20 000. The transition was initiated by perturbing the laminar boundary layer with small random disturbances and was followed all the way to the turbulent state. The porous geometry was modeled by directly resolving the flow within the pores and the damping of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LST analysis showed that UACs had a stabilizing effect over a wide range of frequencies and Reynolds numbers. Additional numerical analyses confirming the stabilizing effect were carried out by Brès et al, [8][9][10] Fedorov et al, 11 Egorov et al, 12 Sandham et al, 13 Fedorov 14 and de Tullio et al 15 Some experimental results for the porous coating were obtained by Rasheed et al, 16 Chokani et al, 17 Fedorov et al 18 The numerical and experimental studies were in reasonable agreement as shown in Fedorov et al 19 and Fedorov. 20 The stabilizing effect of porous walls on a Mach 6.0 boundary layer was also investigated by Hader and Fasel 21 and Hader et al 22 For the results presented in Hader and Fasel 21 a low-order immersed boundary method was employed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LST analysis showed that UACs had a stabilizing effect over a wide range of frequencies and Reynolds numbers. Additional numerical analyses confirming the stabilizing effect were carried out by Brès et al, [8][9][10] Fedorov et al, 11 Egorov et al, 12 Sandham et al, 13 Fedorov 14 and de Tullio et al 15 Some experimental results for the porous coating were obtained by Rasheed et al, 16 Chokani et al, 17 Fedorov et al 18 The numerical and experimental studies were in reasonable agreement as shown in Fedorov et al 19 and Fedorov. 20 The stabilizing effect of porous walls on a Mach 6.0 boundary layer was also investigated by Hader and Fasel 21 and Hader et al 22 For the results presented in Hader and Fasel 21 a low-order immersed boundary method was employed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As a reference the laminar skin friction coefficient and an estimate for the turbulent skin friction coefficient according to White 34 are included in figure 12(a). In addition, the skin friction evolution presented in de Tullio et al 15 was digitized and is plotted for comparison. Initially the averaged skin friction values are nearly identical for all different cases and fairly close to the estimate for the laminar value of c f .…”
Section: E Global Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several trials have shown that this metric is very sensitive to the integration strategy adopted when carrying out the complex indefinite integral (18). This is due to the nature of the integrand in (18) causing the accumulation of round-off error to become more severe (i.e. approaching the value of the integration result itself) as τ departs from unity, that is, for values of y departing from 0, at t = 2.…”
Section: B Impedance Tube Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMS of the difference between the two solutions, evaluated over the interval −0.4 < y < 0.4 and for t = 2, decays initially with forth-order accuracy in space and second-order in time (figure 3), as expected. Several trials have shown that this metric is very sensitive to the integration strategy adopted when carrying out the complex indefinite integral (18). This is due to the nature of the integrand in (18) causing the accumulation of round-off error to become more severe (i.e.…”
Section: B Impedance Tube Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation