2001
DOI: 10.1080/028418501127346837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct MR arthrography of plica synovialis mediopatellaris

Abstract: Direct MR arthrography enabled accurate diagnosis of PSMs and could replace diagnostic arthroscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the study is considered to be more reliable than conventional MR imaging in the evaluation of osteochondral lesions, detection of loose bodies, and delineation of synovial plicae [47,52], it is usually used in the symptomatic postoperative knee to differentiate residual or recurrent meniscal tear from other causes of postoperative pain, such as ligamentous injury, articular cartilage lesions and loose bodies. While conventional MR imaging is valuable in the diagnosis of meniscal injuries in non-operated knees, it has been shown to be less reliable in the demonstration of recurrent or residual tears after meniscectomy or surgical repair [53][54][55].…”
Section: Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the study is considered to be more reliable than conventional MR imaging in the evaluation of osteochondral lesions, detection of loose bodies, and delineation of synovial plicae [47,52], it is usually used in the symptomatic postoperative knee to differentiate residual or recurrent meniscal tear from other causes of postoperative pain, such as ligamentous injury, articular cartilage lesions and loose bodies. While conventional MR imaging is valuable in the diagnosis of meniscal injuries in non-operated knees, it has been shown to be less reliable in the demonstration of recurrent or residual tears after meniscectomy or surgical repair [53][54][55].…”
Section: Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study found that dMRA could be used to detect 17 of 19 (89%) mediopatellar plicae whereas only 3 of 11 (27%) could be detected by cMRI [ 346 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis reported a pooled sensitivity of 77% and pooled specificity of 58% for cMRI in the detection of medial patella plica syndrome [ 347 ].…”
Section: Hipmentioning
confidence: 99%