2009
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2012546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Modeling of Motional Eddy Currents in Highly Saturated Solid Conductors by the Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the differential MEC can find the global solution with less number of elements than the integral FEM needs if the geometry of the electromagnetic problem can be represented with regular brick-shaped elements. [14] shows that MEC is more stable in the calculation of the 2-D motional eddy currents with regular elements in comparison with FEM. Due to its stable convergence and low computational time, the MEC is an attractive alternative to the FEM for modeling electromagnetic devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Whereas the differential MEC can find the global solution with less number of elements than the integral FEM needs if the geometry of the electromagnetic problem can be represented with regular brick-shaped elements. [14] shows that MEC is more stable in the calculation of the 2-D motional eddy currents with regular elements in comparison with FEM. Due to its stable convergence and low computational time, the MEC is an attractive alternative to the FEM for modeling electromagnetic devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the differential MEC can find the global solution with less number of elements than the integral FEM needs, if the geometry of the electromagnetic problem is represented with regular brick-shaped elements. [3] shows that MEC is more stable in the calculation of the 2-D motional eddy currents with regular elements in comparison with FEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It can be find analytical models based on the formal resolution of Maxwell's equations [2], the finite-difference method from Maxwell's equations where the boundary conditions (BCs) come from the FEA [3], the hybrid models [4],..., the semi-analytical model based on the MEC (or reluctances network). Different manner to incorporate magnetic reluctances, magnetic inductances or MMFs in MEC or coupling models with MEC to compute eddy-currents [5][6][7][8]. The main drawbacks of the last works can be liked to the incorporated MMFs or magnetic reluctances which don't take into account the skin effect as well as the method depend on the FEA to get the local quantities that allows computing eddy-current losses.…”
Section: Context Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%