2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.266801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of the Spin-Orbit Interaction in a Two-Electron InAs Nanowire Quantum Dot

Abstract: We demonstrate control of the electron number down to the last electron in tunable few-electron quantum dots defined in catalytically grown InAs nanowires. Using low temperature transport spectroscopy in the Coulomb blockade regime, we propose a method to directly determine the magnitude of the spin-orbit interaction in a two-electron artificial atom with strong spin-orbit coupling. Because of a large effective g factor |g(*)|=8+/-1, the transition from a singlet S to a triplet T+ ground state with increasing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
355
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
31
355
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4. The 50 nm diameter nanowire is placed on top of five predefined Au gate electrodes [37][38][39]. The gate electrodes are electrically isolated from the nanowire by a 20 nm layer of silicon nitride SiN x .…”
Section: Cavity-coupled Dqdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The 50 nm diameter nanowire is placed on top of five predefined Au gate electrodes [37][38][39]. The gate electrodes are electrically isolated from the nanowire by a 20 nm layer of silicon nitride SiN x .…”
Section: Cavity-coupled Dqdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SOC can lift the Pauli spin blockade of electron tunneling in a DQD [33][34][35][36][37]. Our result explicitly shows that this reduction is due to the presence of the spinflipped tunneling.…”
Section: Soc-dependent Tunneling In a Nanowire Dqdmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Because both the gap ∆ so = J [1] so / √ 2 at the anticrossing point and the singlet-triplet splitting J are experimentally measurable quantities [35,39], one can use Eq. (16) to obtain the SOC strength α via x so = /(m e α).…”
Section: For (C) and 2 For (D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preexponential factors are model dependent, and a somewhat different estimate was proposed in Ref. [54]. In GaAs quantum dots [55], the SO coupling constant α is two orders of magnitude smaller than in InAs with l SO ≈ 30 μm, so that the SO coupling may be comparable to the hyperfine-induced coupling, and is usually considered as weaker than it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%