2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.062501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of the Mass Difference ofHo163andDy163

Abstract: The atomic mass difference of (163)Ho and (163)Dy has been directly measured with the Penning-trap mass spectrometer SHIPTRAP applying the novel phase-imaging ion-cyclotron-resonance technique. Our measurement has solved the long-standing problem of large discrepancies in the Q value of the electron capture in (163)Ho determined by different techniques. Our measured mass difference shifts the current Q value of 2555(16) eV evaluated in the Atomic Mass Evaluation 2012 [G. Audi et al., Chin. Phys. C 36, 1157 (20… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This measurement has been able to strongly reduce the uncertainties on Q EC . The value that has been obtained, Q EC = (2.833 ± 0.030 stat ± 0.015 syst ) keV [926] is in very good agreement with the Q EC -value obtained by the analysis of calorimetrically measured 163 Ho spectra. In order to remove systematic uncertainties, at a few eV level, on the Q EC -value as determined by the analysis of the calorimetrically measured spectra, which could derive from solid state effects, an independent measurement at 1 eV precision level is of outmost importance.…”
Section: Electron Capture Experiments (Author: L Gastaldo)supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This measurement has been able to strongly reduce the uncertainties on Q EC . The value that has been obtained, Q EC = (2.833 ± 0.030 stat ± 0.015 syst ) keV [926] is in very good agreement with the Q EC -value obtained by the analysis of calorimetrically measured 163 Ho spectra. In order to remove systematic uncertainties, at a few eV level, on the Q EC -value as determined by the analysis of the calorimetrically measured spectra, which could derive from solid state effects, an independent measurement at 1 eV precision level is of outmost importance.…”
Section: Electron Capture Experiments (Author: L Gastaldo)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The precise knowledge of the Q EC is of outmost importance not only for the investigation of the "standard" effective electron neutrino mass, but also to define with high precision the value of the heavy neutrino mass m 4 through the difference between the position of the possible kink and the endpoint of the spectrum. The uncertainties on the Q EC have already been strongly reduced by the measurements performed using Penning traps [926] and this achievement paved the way for future experiments aiming to the 1 eV precision. 163 Ho EC + pu 163 Ho EC Figure 50.…”
Section: Electron Capture Experiments (Author: L Gastaldo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the Q-value has been precisely determined by Penning trap mass spectrometry to be Q = 2833 ± 30 stat ± 15 syst eV [98]. At the present knowledge, this is the lowest Q for all nuclides undergoing electron capture processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the capture 163 Holmium + bound Electron → excited 163 Dysprosium * + N eutrino (1) the decay energy Q was obtained by a Penning trap measurement by Eliseev et al [19] in the MPI in Heidelberg ( [20,21,22]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%