2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.251102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of the Cosmic-Ray Carbon and Oxygen Spectra from 10GeV/n to 2.2T

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point it is hard to draw any firm conclusion on the origin of this discrepancy, but there is a serious possibility that the problem with the Iron spectrum may be of experimental nature and that only a detailed comparison between different techniques and different analyses can unveil the source of the disagreement. It is probably useful to stress that other discrepancies would deserve the same attention, such as the marked difference between the C and O spectra of AMS-02 compared with those of PAMELA [63] and CALET [64]. At low energies the effects of nuclear fragmentation inside the ex-periment itself are rather large and for heavy elements, such as Iron, this effect requires a careful correction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point it is hard to draw any firm conclusion on the origin of this discrepancy, but there is a serious possibility that the problem with the Iron spectrum may be of experimental nature and that only a detailed comparison between different techniques and different analyses can unveil the source of the disagreement. It is probably useful to stress that other discrepancies would deserve the same attention, such as the marked difference between the C and O spectra of AMS-02 compared with those of PAMELA [63] and CALET [64]. At low energies the effects of nuclear fragmentation inside the ex-periment itself are rather large and for heavy elements, such as Iron, this effect requires a careful correction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cosmic-ray Boron-to-Carbon (secondary-to-primary) ratio has been measured up to ∼ 2 GeV/nucleon and the spectra of Carbon through Iron nuclei have been measured up to approximately 2 TeV/nucleon [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In order to measure the Boron-to-Carbon ratio near 500 GeV/nucleon and the spectra of cosmic-ray nuclei up to 20 TeV/nucleon on a space instrument with limited mass, where a heavy calorimeter or magnetic spectrometer is probably not feasible, a TRD with sensitivity covering the Lorentz factor range 500 < γ < 2 × 10 4 may be a viable approach.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cosmic rays captured with suitable instruments on space satellites from nearby interplanetary space have been found to include several radioactive isotopes, including 14 C, 36 Cl, 26 Al, 10 Be, 59 Ni, and others. Data from satellites (Israel et al 2005(Israel et al , 2018, high-altitude balloons (Walsh et al 2019), and the space station (Adriani et al 2020) have been used to constrain the propagation, specifically the path lengths traversed, for cosmic rays, as their spallation reactions on heavier nuclei such as Fe have created these radioisotopes. For the case of 59 Ni, its detection constrains the time between ejection from its nucleosynthesis source and the acceleration to cosmic-ray energies, because 59 Ni only decays through electron capture, and thus remains stable once fully ionised in cosmic rays after acceleration (Mewaldt et al 2001;Wiedenbeck et al 2001).…”
Section: Radioactivity and Astrophysical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%