2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter by 35-Megahertz Ultrasound Biomicroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
83
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
83
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They found a trend toward the horizontal meridian being the largest, but they also found high variation. Oh et al 18 also found a vertical oval posterior chamber in 28 phakic eyes using 35 MHz UBM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They found a trend toward the horizontal meridian being the largest, but they also found high variation. Oh et al 18 also found a vertical oval posterior chamber in 28 phakic eyes using 35 MHz UBM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several studies [15][16][17][18][19] have evaluated the relationship between WTW and STS diameters in an effort to select adequately sized posterior phakic IOLs. Using different devices to measure the STS and the WTW, they showed a weak correlation (r Z 0.406 to r Z 0.597) between these 2 values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Despite efforts to improve predictability of vault following ICL implantation, it remains poor; the reasons for this are multiple. 5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] High-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) with a wide scanning field has enabled direct measurement of horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) diameter. Poor correspondence (г<0.50) between the horizontal WTW and STS measure has since been reported, however the width of the limits of agreement (LoA) reported between horizontal WTW and STS measures is similar to repeatability limits of STS estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor correspondence (г<0.50) between the horizontal WTW and STS measure has since been reported, however the width of the limits of agreement (LoA) reported between horizontal WTW and STS measures is similar to repeatability limits of STS estimates. UBM devices have relatively low precision in STS estimates (coefficient of variation (CoV): Artemis NA; HiScan 0.9-2.7% 16,24 ; VuMax 5% 25 ) as compared to horizontal WTW measures of Scheimpflug imaging or partial low-coherence inferometry (CoV: Orbscan 0.7%-1% 24 ; Galilei Sirius <0.5% 26,27 ; IOLMaster 2% 28 ; Lenstar 0.2% 23 ). For example, Yokoyama et al have reported the within subject repeatability (S w ) of the Vumax UBM device to be approximately 0.53mm (confidence interval (CI) of repeatability -1.1mm, 1.5mm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%