1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)30993-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of Progesterone in Milk and Plasma by a Sensitive and Simple Enzymeimmunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the development of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technology at the beginning of the 1980s for milk progesterone measurement (Arnstadt and Cleere 1981, Sauer and others 1981, van de Wiel and Koops 1982), on-farm milk progesterone tests quickly became commercially available (Nebel 1988). Consequently, progesterone measurements could for the first time be performed directly on farms, thus abrogating the requirement to transport milk samples to specialised laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the development of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technology at the beginning of the 1980s for milk progesterone measurement (Arnstadt and Cleere 1981, Sauer and others 1981, van de Wiel and Koops 1982), on-farm milk progesterone tests quickly became commercially available (Nebel 1988). Consequently, progesterone measurements could for the first time be performed directly on farms, thus abrogating the requirement to transport milk samples to specialised laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk progesterone testing has a wide range of applications in animal production and veterinary requirements, including the identification of which cows are not pregnant 19–23 days post insemination (Burke and others 2012), confirmation of oestrous signs and pregnancy (Rajamahendran and others 1993, Romagnolo and Nebel 1993), as well as measuring the efficiency and accuracy of the detection of oestrus (Heersche and Nebel 1994), differentiation of ovarian cysts (Booth 1988 ; Sprecher and others 1988) and follow‐up endocrine therapy (Sprecher and others 1990), screening of embryo donors and embryo transfer recipients (Britt and Holt 1988, Herrler and others 1990) and assessment of ovulation detection performance (Morton and Wynn 2010). Following the development of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technology at the beginning of the 1980s for milk progesterone measurement (Arnstadt and Cleere 1981, Sauer and others 1981, van de Wiel and Koops 1982), on‐farm milk progesterone tests quickly became commercially available (Nebel 1988). Consequently, progesterone measurements could for the first time be performed directly on farms, thus abrogating the requirement to transport milk samples to specialised laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of microtitration plates made the EIA a really practicable technique. Microtitration plate EIAs were already described for progesterone (Sauer et al 1982, van de Wiel and Koops 1982), estrone sulphate (Meyer and Gregor 1985), cortisol (Dhar et al 1986), 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF 2a (Meyer 1986) and the boar taint compound 5a androst-16-en-3-one (Merckle et al 1986). The microtitration plate technique offers several advantages: the solid phase separation of bound and unbound tracer is very practical; the amount of reagents and waste is largely reduced; the tests are always clearly arranged and easy to survey; and the colorimetric evaluation of the results is finished within a few minutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%