Frontiers of Biological Energetics 1978
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-225402-4.50077-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of Membrane Potential and Resistance in Giant Cells of Escherichia Coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although direct microelectrode recording of MP has been performed on Escherichia coli that have been artificially enlarged by the manipulation of cell wall synthesis (10), measurement of MP in actively growing bacteria is essentially impossible due to their small size. The distribution of radiolabeled lipophilic cations or charged lipophilic fluorescent dyes across the membrane (11), or the fluxes of potassium (K ϩ ) or rubidium (Rb ϩ ) ions across the membrane, have been used to estimate MP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although direct microelectrode recording of MP has been performed on Escherichia coli that have been artificially enlarged by the manipulation of cell wall synthesis (10), measurement of MP in actively growing bacteria is essentially impossible due to their small size. The distribution of radiolabeled lipophilic cations or charged lipophilic fluorescent dyes across the membrane (11), or the fluxes of potassium (K ϩ ) or rubidium (Rb ϩ ) ions across the membrane, have been used to estimate MP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of intracellular glass microcapillary electrodes for study of transmembrane potential differences (Osterhout (1925) for giant algal cells, Ling & Gerard (1949) for muscle and nerve), opened up a wide range of preparations for direct study of bioelectric phenomena: in secretion, in energy distribution and in energy conservation, as well as in excitability. Furthermore, over the past 10 years the use of ultrafine microcapillaries (tip diameters of 0-05-0 2 Itm: Brown & Flaming, 1977) has spread to a variety of unexpectedly small cells, including insect optic cells (Jensen & DeVoe, 1983), isolated cultured cells (Sherbet, 1978), small plant cells (Etherton, Keifer & Spanswick, 1977;Bates, Goldsmith & Goldsmith, 1982), fungal spheroplasts (Blatt & Slayman, 1983), and even certain bacteria (Felle, Stetson, Long & Slayman, 1979). At the same time, however, limitations of the microcapillary technique have become glaringly obvious: finite sealing resistances and flooding of cell cytoplasm with spurious salt can easily falsify all of the apparent electrical paramenters of punctured cells (Lassen, 1977;Nelson, Ehrenfeld & Lindemann, 1978;Page, Kelday & Bowling, 1981;Fromm & Schultz, 1981;Blatt & Slayman, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[78,79,[131][132][133][134], but cf. [135]) based on bilayer-mediated equilibration according to the Nernst equation [136]. However, we recognise that such cyanine dyes, much as ethidium bromide [120] and other xenobiotics [137,138], are likely to be both influx and efflux substrates for various transporters [139], so such an interpretation should be treated with some caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%