Direct measurement of left ventricular outflow tract by transthoracic real-time 3D-echocardiography increases accuracy in assessment of aortic valve stenosis
“…Previous studies using this method 25,26 revealed the elliptical morphology of the LVOT and an underestimation of the calculation of AVA and SVi compared with the LVOT measured by 2D TTE. Tamborini et al 27 showed that 3D TTE is a reliable and valid imaging alternative to MDCT in preoperative transcatheter aortic valve implantation evaluation.…”
Section: D Transesophageal Echocardiographic Methodologymentioning
Background: Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) measurement is a critical step in the quantification of aortic valve area. The assumption of a circular morphology of the LVOT may induce some errors. The aim of this study was to assess the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the LVOT and its impact on grading aortic stenosis severity.
“…Previous studies using this method 25,26 revealed the elliptical morphology of the LVOT and an underestimation of the calculation of AVA and SVi compared with the LVOT measured by 2D TTE. Tamborini et al 27 showed that 3D TTE is a reliable and valid imaging alternative to MDCT in preoperative transcatheter aortic valve implantation evaluation.…”
Section: D Transesophageal Echocardiographic Methodologymentioning
Background: Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) measurement is a critical step in the quantification of aortic valve area. The assumption of a circular morphology of the LVOT may induce some errors. The aim of this study was to assess the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the LVOT and its impact on grading aortic stenosis severity.
“…1), providing incremental clinical usefulness compared with 2D TTE. Besides accurately assessing left ventricle (LV) volumes in valvular heart disease, 3D TTE has improved the assessment of valvular anatomic features and regurgitation as well as left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) dimensions (2)(3)(4). In this review, we discuss the role of 3DE in evaluating valvular anatomic features, volumetric valve quantification, pre-surgical planning, intraprocedural guidance, and post-procedural assessment of valvular heart disease.…”
“…However, analysis of 3DE images has demonstrated that the LVOT cross-section is not always circular, but often is elliptical. By uniformly assuming a circular shape, AVA may be underestimated (4). It has been shown that accuracy of the AVA calculated by the continuity equation is improved by substituting planimetered LVOT area measured from 3DE (4).…”
Significant advances in 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) technology have ushered its use into clinical practice. The recent advent of real-time 3DE using matrix array transthoracic and transesophageal transducers has resulted in improved image spatial resolution, and therefore, enhanced visualization of the pathomorphological features of the cardiac valves compared with previously used sparse array transducers. It has enabled an unparalleled real-time visualization of valves and subvalvular anatomic features from a single volume acquisition without the need for offline reconstruction. On-cart or offline post-processing using commercially available and custom 3-dimensional analysis software allows the quantification of multiple parameters, such as orifice area, prolapse height and volume in mitral valve disease, area of the left ventricular outflow tract, and tricuspid annular geometry. In this review, we discuss the incremental role of 3DE in evaluating valvular anatomic features, volumetric quantification, pre-surgical planning, intraprocedural guidance, and post-procedural assessment of valvular heart disease.
“…More recent articles have suggested that direct measurement of the LVOT by transthoracic real-time 3D-echocardiography may increase the accuracy of this measurement. 27,28 In patients with a suboptimal window, transesophageal echocardiogram is a reasonable alternative. 29 There are also studies showing good accuracy in measuring the AVA with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.…”
Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common valvular disorders affecting the aging US population. Although guidelines published by leading cardiac societies outline diagnostic and management strategies for this condition, in daily practice clinicians face dilemmas when trying to confirm the diagnosis of severe AS because of discrepancies in quantitative parameters obtained by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. More recently, a low-gradient variant of severe AS has been increasingly recognized in the setting of normal ejection fraction. This review focuses on the current clinical challenges of AS diagnosis with a special focus on paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS in the setting of preserved ejection fraction. We evaluate all aspects of AS quantitation in reference to paradoxical low flow aortic stenosis and discuss newer parameters which may help the clinician reconcile some of the discrepancies of this less understood condition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.