2018
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct measurement of intercellular CO2 concentration in a gas-exchange system resolves overestimation using the standard method

Abstract: Obtaining leaf intercellular CO2 concentration by direct measurement, which is affected by neither cuticle properties nor stomatal behavior, is better than by calculation, which largely neglects cuticular gas transport when stomatal gas transport is restricted

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The controlled closure or opening of the stomata is a strategy of plants to regulate the flow of water and O 2 /CO 2 into and out of the leaf [22,23,36]; so that if the stomata remain closed, the leaf will lose less water, but will also absorb less CO 2 , which will reduce the rate of photosynthesis [8,18,37]. The opening of stomata during the appropriate periods of vapor pressure is a mechanism that genotypes use to avoid water loss due to a gradient between air in the stomata versus atmosphere thus regulating photosynthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controlled closure or opening of the stomata is a strategy of plants to regulate the flow of water and O 2 /CO 2 into and out of the leaf [22,23,36]; so that if the stomata remain closed, the leaf will lose less water, but will also absorb less CO 2 , which will reduce the rate of photosynthesis [8,18,37]. The opening of stomata during the appropriate periods of vapor pressure is a mechanism that genotypes use to avoid water loss due to a gradient between air in the stomata versus atmosphere thus regulating photosynthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to consider the implications of g s for RACiR and A/C i measurements. Several studies (Boyer, 2015a(Boyer, , 2015bTominaga & Kawamitsu, 2015;Tominaga, Shimada, & Kawamitsu, 2018) show that C i is overestimated due to cuticular conductance to water. Due to the rate of RACiR, the bias in C i due to cuticle conductance should be less variable relative to standard A/C i measurements, because g s is less variable.…”
Section: Caveats For Racir In the Li-6400mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…significantly disturbed when gs was suppressed at pF 3.8 or more (Figures 3(d, h and 5j)). The fluctuation in C i was probably an error problem with the calculation formula (Tominaga & Kawamitsu, 2015a, 2015bTominaga, Shimada & Kawamitsu, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%