2022
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.91.094501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measurement of Electron Cyclotron Emission during High Guide Field Magnetic Reconnection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the E t profile shown in figure 8(a) is similar to that for the open electrode condition shown in figure 6(a), in-plane electrostatic field E z was largely suppressed in the inboardside downstream region (R < 0.25 m) as shown in figure 8(b), in which the radial locations of the magnetic field lines connected to electrode pairs A-D were superimposed by white This suppression of |E z | in the inboard-side downstream region certainly changed the parallel electric field, but its effect was restrictive. As shown in figure 8(c), E // in the inboard-side down stream region was reduced in comparison to the case with open electrodes but its sign is still reversed except for the very inboard area of R < 0.2 m, where intense SXR [21] and ECE [23] emission were observed when the inboard limiter was equipped with the UTST device.…”
Section: Effect Of Short-time Connected Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although the E t profile shown in figure 8(a) is similar to that for the open electrode condition shown in figure 6(a), in-plane electrostatic field E z was largely suppressed in the inboardside downstream region (R < 0.25 m) as shown in figure 8(b), in which the radial locations of the magnetic field lines connected to electrode pairs A-D were superimposed by white This suppression of |E z | in the inboard-side downstream region certainly changed the parallel electric field, but its effect was restrictive. As shown in figure 8(c), E // in the inboard-side down stream region was reduced in comparison to the case with open electrodes but its sign is still reversed except for the very inboard area of R < 0.2 m, where intense SXR [21] and ECE [23] emission were observed when the inboard limiter was equipped with the UTST device.…”
Section: Effect Of Short-time Connected Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 85%