Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2021/116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Measure Matching for Crowd Counting

Abstract: Traditional crowd counting approaches usually use Gaussian assumption to generate pseudo density ground truth, which suffers from problems like inaccurate estimation of the Gaussian kernel sizes. In this paper, we propose a new measure-based counting approach to regress the predicted density maps to the scattered point-annotated ground truth directly. First, crowd counting is formulated as a measure matching problem. Second, we derive a semi-balanced form of Sinkhorn divergence, based on which a Sinkhorn count… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the result shows, our MAN performs great accuracy on all the four benchmark datasets. MAN improves MAE and MSE values of second best method S3 [14] from 80.6 to 77.3 and from 139.8 to 131.5, respectively. On JHU++, it improves these two values from 59.4 to 53.4 and from 244.0 to 209.9, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the result shows, our MAN performs great accuracy on all the four benchmark datasets. MAN improves MAE and MSE values of second best method S3 [14] from 80.6 to 77.3 and from 139.8 to 131.5, respectively. On JHU++, it improves these two values from 59.4 to 53.4 and from 244.0 to 209.9, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…BL [21] designs the loss function based on Bayesian theory, calculating the deviation of expectation for each crowd. And further works [14,23,38] focus on optimal transport and measure the divergence without depending on the assumption of Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Crowd Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate measure matching can help to improve the counting performance. S3 [35] proposes a novel measure matching based on Sinkhorn divergence, avoiding generating the density maps. UOT [36] uses unbalanced optimal transport (UOT) distance to quantify the discrepancy between two measures, outputting sharper density maps.…”
Section: Cnn-based Crowd Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [9] formulates crowd counting as a distribution matching problem and constructs loss using optimal transport. Lin et al [45] further improve the loss function based on Sinkhorn distance. More improvements such as incorporating perspective information [41], [46], auxiliary task [34], [47], cross-datasets training [48], [49] and neural architecture search [50] further promote the counting performance.…”
Section: A Crowd Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%