Poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) or SMA and its derivatives,
a family of synthetic amphipathic copolymers, are increasingly used
to directly solubilize cell membranes to functionally reconstitute
membrane proteins in native-like copolymer–lipid nanodiscs.
Although these copolymers act, de facto, like a “macromolecular
detergent”, the polymer-based lipid-nanodiscs has been demonstrated
to be an excellent membrane mimetic for structural and functional
studies of membrane proteins and their complexes by a variety of biophysical
and biochemical approaches. In many studies reported in the literature,
the choice of the right SMA formulation can depend on a number of
factors, and the experimental conditions are typically developed according
to a trial-and-error process since each studied system requires adapted
protocols. While increasing number of nanodisc-forming copolymers
are reported to be useful and they provide flexibilities in optimizing
the sample preparation conditions, it is important to develop a systematic
protocol that can be used for various applications. In this context,
there is a vital necessity of benchmarking the performances of existing
copolymer formulations, assessing crucial parameters for the successful
extraction, isolation, and stabilization of membrane proteins. In
this study, we compare both copolymers and copolymer–lipid
nanodiscs obtained by SMA-EA with a set of anionic XIRAN copolymer
formulations commercially available under the names of SL25010 P,
SL30010 P, and SL40005 P. The reported results show how the critical
micellar concentration (c.m.c.) of each copolymer is significantly
altered in the presence of lipids and confirms the existence of an
equilibrium between nanodisc-bound and “free” or “micellar”
copolymer chains in the solution. We believe that these findings can
be exploited to optimize studies that involve the necessity of special
copolymers, which would not only simplify the applications but also
broaden the scope of polymer-based nanodiscs.