2020
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2020.2998958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Laser Writing for Deterministic Lateral Displacement of Submicron Particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DE drop-making devices have used either a 3D nested channel geometry and/or surface wetting control to achieve water-in-oil-in-water emulsification. , 3D geometries position a stream of water-in-oil droplets within a surrounding aqueous flow ensuring the correct formation of DEs, independent of the surface wetting of the channels. This concentric channel architecture is most commonly achieved by glass capillaries, 3D printing, or by multi-layer soft lithography. , These fabrication methods require complex equipment, expensive facilities, and/or technical expertise to perform. Out of these, glass capillary devices feature greater compatibility with organic solvents and robust surface modification options, making them well suited to DE production for drug delivery and microparticle applications . However, glass capillaries are limited due to greater device-to-device variability and difficulty producing small DE drops due to the larger channel dimensions. Smaller DE drops (∼50 um or less) are required for flow cytometry sorting and improve throughput during sorting, single-cell analysis, and ddPCR …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DE drop-making devices have used either a 3D nested channel geometry and/or surface wetting control to achieve water-in-oil-in-water emulsification. , 3D geometries position a stream of water-in-oil droplets within a surrounding aqueous flow ensuring the correct formation of DEs, independent of the surface wetting of the channels. This concentric channel architecture is most commonly achieved by glass capillaries, 3D printing, or by multi-layer soft lithography. , These fabrication methods require complex equipment, expensive facilities, and/or technical expertise to perform. Out of these, glass capillary devices feature greater compatibility with organic solvents and robust surface modification options, making them well suited to DE production for drug delivery and microparticle applications . However, glass capillaries are limited due to greater device-to-device variability and difficulty producing small DE drops due to the larger channel dimensions. Smaller DE drops (∼50 um or less) are required for flow cytometry sorting and improve throughput during sorting, single-cell analysis, and ddPCR …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral displacement of the study noted 15.3 ± 8.6 µm over a 500 µm channel length. Results indicate the promising application of 3D-printed DLD systems for the manipulation of submicron particles [ 156 ] that can be used for efficient bioprinting of EVs.…”
Section: Evs In Bioengineering Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 These fabrication methods, however, require complex equipment, expensive facilities, and/or technical expertise to perform. [38][39][40] Further, glass capillary fabrication is limited to larger channel dimensions and faces greater device-to-device variation, 41 which can make the production of the small DE drops that are suitable for flow cytometry sorting, 42 more challenging. To avoid full 3-D fabrication, semi-planar DE drop makers have been designed to use surface wetting to control emulsification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%