2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct laser fabrication of meso-scale 2D and 3D architectures with micrometric feature resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the main factors in choosing the construction process are accuracy, printing speed, material range, and dimensions of the desired object. According to the above considerations, the appropriate methods are microstereolithography (µSL) 5,6 , projection microstereolithography (PµSL) 7,8 , and two-photon polymerization (TPP) 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the main factors in choosing the construction process are accuracy, printing speed, material range, and dimensions of the desired object. According to the above considerations, the appropriate methods are microstereolithography (µSL) 5,6 , projection microstereolithography (PµSL) 7,8 , and two-photon polymerization (TPP) 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we also demonstrated that sliding walls can be prepared by 3D printing, allowing for future versatile and low-cost implementation of walls with complex structures and functions libraries. The development of high-resolution 3D printing 34 will accompany the development of sliding wall technology and expand the range of its applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this experiment, the sliding wall had a design similar to that used for valving with an integrated window (see Fig. 5a) and was produced with a high-resolution stereolithographic 3D printer 34 . A solution of polyethyleneglycol-diacrylate 700 (PEGDA) in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (concentration 45% v/v) was photopolymerized inside the window, producing a hydrogel with a pore size of approximately 5 nm 35 , and was slid to the intersection with the fluidic channel linking reservoirs 1 and 2 (Fig.…”
Section: Membrane-based Electrokinetic Dna Preconcentration and Purifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A soft microcantilever (Bioplume V6, LAAS, Toulouse, France), a polymeric replication of a previously developed silicon microcantilever [39,40] fabricated by 3D-printing of a DS-3000 photoresist (DWS, Thiene, Italy) with a Dilase 3D printer (Kloe SA, St Mathieu de Tréviers, France) [41,42], was used to deposit microdrops of solutions on the microstructured face of the bundle. Details on the polymeric microcantilever conception are reported in the electronic Supplementary Materials ( Figure S4).…”
Section: Surface Biofunctionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously used silicon cantilevers for optical fiber functionalization [35] did not allow a proper deposition of liquid drops onto the etched fibers used in this work as they damaged the higher aspect ratio and more fragile micropillar structures (See electronic Supplementary Materials Figure S5). Newly developed 3D-printed polymeric microcantilevers [41,42] (Figure 1 and electronic Supplementary Materials Figure S4) were soft enough to touch the apex without breaking the structures nor damaging the gold layer, and to deposit microdrops of solution with an appropriate size (see Figure 2A for the droplets' deposition plan (i), the schematic deposition principle (ii) and the images of the droplets deposition with the soft polymeric cantilever (iii, iv)). The spotting solutions were prepared with 5% glycerol in order to make them more viscous for liquid deposition and to avoid a complete spot drying.…”
Section: Surface Biofunctionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%