2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3064142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct laboratory observation of patchy saturation and its effects on ultrasonic velocities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This rapid drop if velocities is caused by the transition of scCO 2 from the patchy distribution at which pore pressure has no time to equilibrate within the liquid phase to a more homogeneous distribution at which differences in wave-induced pore pressure have time to flow and equilibrate among the various phases. These patchy and effectively homogeneous states can be described with the Gassmann-Hill and Gassmann-Wood theoretical models, respectively (e.g., Müller et al, 2008;Lebedev et al, 2009;Ling et al, 2009;Müller et al, 2010;Caspari et al, 2011 Comparison of P-and S-wave log velocities with laboratory-measured velocities on brine-saturated samples at reservoir conditions and the ones calculated using Gassman fluid substitution model from laboratory measurements on the dry samples. The result of Gassmann's fluid substitution using the laboratory measurements on dry sample 1442.1H cut parallel to the bedding is shown in the insert.…”
Section: Effects Of Co 2 Injection Into Dry Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rapid drop if velocities is caused by the transition of scCO 2 from the patchy distribution at which pore pressure has no time to equilibrate within the liquid phase to a more homogeneous distribution at which differences in wave-induced pore pressure have time to flow and equilibrate among the various phases. These patchy and effectively homogeneous states can be described with the Gassmann-Hill and Gassmann-Wood theoretical models, respectively (e.g., Müller et al, 2008;Lebedev et al, 2009;Ling et al, 2009;Müller et al, 2010;Caspari et al, 2011 Comparison of P-and S-wave log velocities with laboratory-measured velocities on brine-saturated samples at reservoir conditions and the ones calculated using Gassman fluid substitution model from laboratory measurements on the dry samples. The result of Gassmann's fluid substitution using the laboratory measurements on dry sample 1442.1H cut parallel to the bedding is shown in the insert.…”
Section: Effects Of Co 2 Injection Into Dry Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of recent work indicating inhomogeneous CO 2 distribution during small scale (core and field) injections (Benson et al, 2005, Daley et al, 2008, Lebedev, et al, 2009, Benson, 2008 we have chosen a patchy saturation fluid substitution theory. This theoretical model, initially proposed by White (1975), includes the corrections made by Dutta and Seriff (1979), for the prediction and interpretation of seismic property changes due to partial CO 2 saturation.…”
Section: Petrophysical Model -Patchy Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory observations have also demonstrated the effect of partial saturation on acoustic velocities ͑e.g., Winkler and Nur, 1979;Murphy, 1982;Paffenholz and Burkhardt, 1989;Knight et al, 1998͒ and are supported by X-ray computer tomography images of the patch distribution ͑e.g., Cadoret et al, 1995;Monsen and Johnstad, 2005;Lebedev et al, 2009;Toms-Stewart et al, 2009͒ and numerical simulations ͑e.g., Carcione et al, 2003;Masson and Pride, 2007;Picotti et al, 2007;Wenzlau and Müller, 2009͒. Wave-induced fluid flow effects in the fluid are modeled by isolated spherical gas patches in the liquid saturating a homogeneous matrix, as first proposed by White ͑1975͒. Since then, significant progress has been made by considering various patch distributions and flow regimes Odé, 1979a, 1979b;Norris, 1993;Gelinsky et al, 1998;Johnson, 2001;Gurevich, 2004, 2005;Müller et al, 2008;Gurevich et al, 2009;Picotti et al, 2010͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%